• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model.理解医疗保健中复杂干预措施的实施:规范化过程模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Sep 19;7:148. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-148.
2
A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care.一种用于评估和评价医疗保健中复杂干预措施的合理模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 7;6:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-86.
3
Effect of care management program structure on implementation: a normalization process theory analysis.护理管理项目结构对实施的影响:规范化过程理论分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):386. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1613-1.
4
Factors affecting feasibility and acceptability of a practice-based educational intervention to support evidence-based prescribing: a qualitative study.影响基于实践的教育干预以支持循证处方的可行性和可接受性的因素:一项定性研究
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):661-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh614. Epub 2004 Nov 4.
5
Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.运用常态化进程理论对复杂医疗干预措施的可行性研究和进程评估:系统综述。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1.
6
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
7
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
8
[Developing evidence based guidelines on cardiac rehabilitation - phase 1: a qualitative review].[制定基于证据的心脏康复指南——第1阶段:定性综述]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2002 Aug;41(4):226-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33267.
9
Adopting health behavior change theory throughout the clinical practice guideline process.在整个临床实践指南制定过程中采用健康行为改变理论。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007 Fall;27(4):201-7. doi: 10.1002/chp.138.
10
Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.信息系统支持作为慢性病管理的关键成功因素:必要但不充分。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Dec;75(12):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.042. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Illuminating the "black box" of complex suicide prevention interventions: towards a theory of implementation using the normalisation process theory.揭示复杂自杀预防干预措施的“黑匣子”:运用常态化过程理论构建一种实施理论
Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 7;5:1473682. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1473682. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and refinement of an online CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) course for organizations and providers delivering vaccinations and other needle procedures.为提供疫苗接种及其他注射程序的机构和服务提供者开发并完善一门在线CARD(舒适、询问、放松、分散注意力)课程。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2491853. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2491853. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
3
Bridging the gap in mental health literacy: co-adapting and feasibility testing a digital intervention to improve mental health literacy amongst young people aged 12-14 in the UK.弥合心理健康素养差距:共同改编并进行可行性测试一项数字干预措施,以提高英国12至14岁青少年的心理健康素养。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 21;16:1546109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1546109. eCollection 2025.
4
Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: implementation strategies derived from normalization process theory.实施评估与研究的转化框架:源自常态化过程理论的实施策略
Implement Sci. 2025 Jul 27;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01444-5.
5
A community pharmacy-based program to enhance adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors (PACHA): protocol for a pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项基于社区药房的提高乳腺癌幸存者辅助内分泌治疗依从性的项目(PACHA):一项试点整群随机对照试验的方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01676-8.
6
Temporal Relationship Between Treatment Burden and Self-Care and Its Impact on Systolic Blood Pressure and Hypertension Control.治疗负担与自我护理之间的时间关系及其对收缩压和高血压控制的影响。
Int J Gen Med. 2025 Jul 1;18:3597-3607. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S517281. eCollection 2025.
7
Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial With a Mobile Health Intervention for Children With Obesity.一项针对肥胖儿童的移动健康干预随机对照试验的过程评估
Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Jun 25;12:30502225251348292. doi: 10.1177/30502225251348292. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
8
Implementation of a Quality Improvement and Clinical Decision Support Tool for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care: Process Evaluation.基层医疗中癌症诊断质量改进与临床决策支持工具的实施:过程评估
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 12;11:e65461. doi: 10.2196/65461.
9
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
10
Task shifting from general practitioners to nurses in out-of-hours primary care: an explorative case study of team-based practices.非工作时间基层医疗中从全科医生到护士的任务转移:基于团队实践的探索性案例研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Sep;43(3):626-638. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2490911. Epub 2025 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model.初级保健中复杂干预措施的过程评估:运用规范化过程模型理解试验
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Jul 24;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-42.
2
Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care.设计与评估旨在改善医疗保健的复杂干预措施。
BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):455-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE.
3
Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.规划与研究患者护理的改善:理论视角的运用
Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93-138. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x.
4
A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care.一种用于评估和评价医疗保健中复杂干预措施的合理模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 7;6:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-86.
5
Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions.评估复杂医疗保健干预措施中的方法学问题。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jun;54(5):612-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03869.x.
6
Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.复杂干预随机对照试验中的过程评估
BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
7
Complex interventions and the chamber of secrets: understanding why they work and why they do not.复杂干预措施与密室之谜:理解其奏效及失效的原因
J R Soc Med. 2005 Dec;98(12):553. doi: 10.1177/014107680509801218.
8
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach.使心理学理论有助于实施循证实践:一种共识方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
9
Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.服务组织中的创新扩散:系统综述与建议
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
10
A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model.对扩散模型的前瞻性与回顾性审视。
J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:13-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730490271449.

理解医疗保健中复杂干预措施的实施:规范化过程模型。

Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model.

作者信息

May Carl, Finch Tracy, Mair Frances, Ballini Luciana, Dowrick Christopher, Eccles Martin, Gask Linda, MacFarlane Anne, Murray Elizabeth, Rapley Tim, Rogers Anne, Treweek Shaun, Wallace Paul, Anderson George, Burns Jo, Heaven Ben

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AA, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Sep 19;7:148. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-148.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-7-148
PMID:17880693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2089069/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Normalization Process Model is a theoretical model that assists in explaining the processes by which complex interventions become routinely embedded in health care practice. It offers a framework for process evaluation and also for comparative studies of complex interventions. It focuses on the factors that promote or inhibit the routine embedding of complex interventions in health care practice.

METHODS

A formal theory structure is used to define the model, and its internal causal relations and mechanisms. The model is broken down to show that it is consistent and adequate in generating accurate description, systematic explanation, and the production of rational knowledge claims about the workability and integration of complex interventions.

RESULTS

The model explains the normalization of complex interventions by reference to four factors demonstrated to promote or inhibit the operationalization and embedding of complex interventions (interactional workability, relational integration, skill-set workability, and contextual integration).

CONCLUSION

The model is consistent and adequate. Repeated calls for theoretically sound process evaluations in randomized controlled trials of complex interventions, and policy-makers who call for a proper understanding of implementation processes, emphasize the value of conceptual tools like the Normalization Process Model.

摘要

背景

规范化过程模型是一种理论模型,有助于解释复杂干预措施在医疗保健实践中常规化嵌入的过程。它为过程评估以及复杂干预措施的比较研究提供了一个框架。它关注促进或抑制复杂干预措施在医疗保健实践中常规化嵌入的因素。

方法

使用正式的理论结构来定义该模型及其内部因果关系和机制。对该模型进行分解,以表明它在生成关于复杂干预措施的可行性和整合的准确描述、系统解释以及合理知识主张方面是一致且充分的。

结果

该模型通过参考四个已证明可促进或抑制复杂干预措施的实施和嵌入的因素(交互可行性、关系整合、技能集可行性和情境整合)来解释复杂干预措施的规范化。

结论

该模型是一致且充分的。在复杂干预措施的随机对照试验中,反复呼吁进行理论上合理的过程评估,以及政策制定者呼吁正确理解实施过程,都强调了像规范化过程模型这样的概念工具的价值。