• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂干预随机对照试验中的过程评估

Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.

作者信息

Oakley Ann, Strange Vicki, Bonell Chris, Allen Elizabeth, Stephenson Judith

机构信息

Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London WC1H ONR.

出版信息

BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413
PMID:16484270
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1370978/
Abstract

Most randomised controlled trials focus on outcomes, not on the processes involved in implementing an intervention. Using an example from school based health promotion, this paper argues that including a process evaluation would improve the science of many randomised controlled trials

摘要

大多数随机对照试验关注的是结果，而非干预实施过程。本文以学校健康促进为例，认为纳入过程评估将提升许多随机对照试验的科学性。

相似文献

1
Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.复杂干预随机对照试验中的过程评估
BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
2
A cluster randomised controlled trial of the Wellbeing in Secondary Education (WISE) Project - an intervention to improve the mental health support and training available to secondary school teachers: protocol for an integrated process evaluation.中学教育幸福感（WISE）项目的整群随机对照试验——一项旨在改善中学教师心理健康支持与培训的干预措施：综合过程评估方案
Trials. 2018 May 4;19(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2617-4.
3
A school-based randomized controlled trial of peer-led sex education in England.英国一项基于学校的同伴主导性教育随机对照试验。
Control Clin Trials. 2003 Oct;24(5):643-57. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00070-9.
4
Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol.肌肉骨骼疾病随机对照试验中复杂干预措施的过程评价：系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e028160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028160.
5
JACK trial protocol: a phase III multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial of a school-based relationship and sexuality education intervention focusing on young male perspectives.JACK试验方案：一项III期多中心整群随机对照试验，该试验是针对以学校为基础的关系与性教育干预措施，重点关注年轻男性的观点。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 28;8(7):e022128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022128.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
[Cluster randomised trials: an important method in primary care research].[整群随机试验：初级保健研究中的一种重要方法]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009;103(7):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2009.07.004.
8
Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension.社会和心理干预随机试验的报告：CONSORT-SPI 2018扩展版
Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2733-1.
9
A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls).对 PLAN-A 干预（同伴主导的青少年女性身体活动干预）的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):1203. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7545-z.
10
Rationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a school-based peer-led anti-smoking intervention in the UK: the ASSIST cluster randomised trial [ISRCTN55572965].英国一项基于学校的同伴主导的戒烟干预综合评估的基本原理、设计与实施：ASSIST整群随机试验[ISRCTN55572965]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Apr 22;5:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-43.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of musculoskeletal conditions with remotely delivered physiotherapy versus face-to-face physiotherapy: process evaluation of the REFORM trial using the Realist Evaluation and the RE-AIM Framework.远程物理治疗与面对面物理治疗对肌肉骨骼疾病的管理：使用现实主义评价和RE-AIM框架对REFORM试验的过程评价
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 28;15(8):e097770. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097770.
2
A Process Evaluation of the UK Randomised Trial Evaluating 'iSupport', an Online e-Health Intervention for Adult Carers of People Living with Dementia.一项针对英国随机试验的过程评估，该试验评估了“iSupport”，这是一种针对痴呆症患者成年护理者的在线电子健康干预措施。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;15(8):1107. doi: 10.3390/bs15081107.
3
The impact of collaborative pharmaceutical care on hospital discharge medication error prevalence: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.协作药学服务对医院出院用药错误发生率的影响：一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Jul 31;20:100638. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100638. eCollection 2025 Dec.
4
Facilitators and Barriers to Sustainment of a Community Choir Program to Promote Health Among Diverse Older Adults: A Multi-site Study.促进社区合唱团项目持续开展以增进不同老年人群健康的促进因素与障碍：一项多地点研究
Int J Community Music. 2025 Mar;18(1):9-30. doi: 10.1386/ijcm_00116_1. Epub 2025 May 31.
5
A leave-one-out algorithm for contribution analysis in component network meta-analysis.一种用于成分网络荟萃分析中贡献分析的留一法算法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02619-w.
6
Precision computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (cCBT) intervention for adolescents with depression (SPARX-UK): protocol for the process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled feasibility trial.针对青少年抑郁症的精准计算机化认知行为疗法（cCBT）干预（英国SPARX）：一项试点随机对照可行性试验的过程评估方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):e092483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092483.
7
Process evaluations nested in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions: a scoping review of approaches and reporting.嵌套于复杂干预随机对照试验中的过程评估：方法与报告的范围综述
Trials. 2025 Jul 30;26(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08910-x.
8
A mixed methods process evaluation of the implementation of a peer coaching intervention to improve the execution of preventive tasks by occupational physicians.一项关于实施同伴辅导干预以改善职业医生预防性任务执行情况的混合方法过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 30;25(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12950-z.
9
Preventing and approaching crises for frail community-dwelling patients through innovative care (PRACTIC): study protocol for a process evaluation of a complex intervention in home care service.通过创新护理预防和应对社区居家体弱患者的危机（PRACTIC）：一项家庭护理服务复杂干预过程评估的研究方案
Trials. 2025 May 28;26(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08876-w.
10
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for Managing Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, and Misophonia: The 2025 Tonndorf Lecture.用于管理耳鸣、恐声症和恐音症的认知行为疗法（CBT）：2025年通多夫讲座
Brain Sci. 2025 May 19;15(5):526. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050526.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of day care on socially disadvantaged families: an example of the use of process evaluation within a randomized controlled trial.日托对社会弱势家庭的影响：随机对照试验中过程评估应用的一个实例。
Child Care Health Dev. 2004 Nov;30(6):691-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00481.x.
2
Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial.在整群随机社区干预试验中探索实施差异和当地背景的方法。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Sep;58(9):788-93. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.014415.
3
The Social Support and Family Health Study: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of two alternative forms of postnatal support for mothers living in disadvantaged inner-city areas.社会支持与家庭健康研究：一项针对生活在贫困市中心地区母亲的两种产后支持替代形式的随机对照试验及经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Aug;8(32):iii, ix-x, 1-120. doi: 10.3310/hta8320.
4
Pupil-led sex education in England (RIPPLE study): cluster-randomised intervention trial.英国由学生主导的性教育（涟漪研究）：整群随机干预试验。
Lancet. 2004;364(9431):338-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16722-6.
5
Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be?复杂干预措施：随机对照试验能有多“失控”？
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1561-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561.
6
Developing complex interventions for rigorous evaluation--a case study from rural Zimbabwe.开发用于严格评估的复杂干预措施——来自津巴布韦农村的案例研究
Health Educ Res. 2004 Oct;19(5):570-5. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg073. Epub 2004 May 20.
7
A school-based randomized controlled trial of peer-led sex education in England.英国一项基于学校的同伴主导性教育随机对照试验。
Control Clin Trials. 2003 Oct;24(5):643-57. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00070-9.
8
Peer-led HIV prevention among gay men in London: process evaluation.伦敦男同性恋者中同伴主导的艾滋病预防：过程评估
AIDS Care. 2002 Jun;14(3):351-60. doi: 10.1080/09540120220123739.
9
Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.评估公共卫生干预措施证据的标准。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Feb;56(2):119-27. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.2.119.
10
Randomised trials of socially complex interventions: promise or peril?社会复杂干预措施的随机试验：是希望还是风险？
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001 Apr;6(2):123-6. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927224.