Pollard Henry, Hoskins Wayne, McHardy Andrew, Bonello Rod, Garbutt Peter, Swain Mike, Dragasevic George, Pribicevic Mario, Vitiello Andrew
Department of Health and Chiropractic, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
Chiropr Osteopat. 2007 Sep 19;15:14. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-14.
Sports chiropractic within Australia has a chequered historical background of unorthodox individualistic displays of egocentric treatment approaches that emphasise specific technique preference and individual prowess rather than standardised evidence based management. This situation has changed in recent years with the acceptance of many within sports chiropractic to operate under an evidence informed banner and to embrace a research culture. Despite recent developments within the sports chiropractic movement, the profession is still plagued by a minority of practitioners continuing to espouse certain marginal and outlandish technique systems that beleaguer the mainstream core of sports chiropractic as a cohesive and homogeneous group. Modern chiropractic management is frequently multimodal in nature and incorporates components of passive and active care. Such management typically incorporates spinal and peripheral manipulation, mobilisation, soft tissue techniques, rehabilitation and therapeutic exercises. Externally, sports chiropractic has faced hurdles too, with a lack of recognition and acceptance by organized and orthodox sports medical groups. Whilst some arguments against the inclusion of chiropractic may be legitimate due to its historical baggage, much of the argument appears to be anti-competitive, insecure and driven by a closed-shop mentality.sequently, chiropractic as a profession still remains a pariah to the organised sports medicine world. Add to this an uncertain continuing education system, a lack of protection for the title 'sports chiropractor', a lack of a recognized specialist status and a lack of support from traditional chiropractic, the challenges for the growth and acceptance of the sports chiropractor are considerable. This article outlines the historical and current challenges, both internal and external, faced by sports chiropractic within Australia and proposes positive changes that will assist in recognition and inclusion of sports chiropractic in both chiropractic and multi-disciplinary sports medicine alike.
在澳大利亚,运动整脊疗法有着复杂的历史背景,存在一些非正统的、以自我为中心的治疗方法,这些方法强调特定的技术偏好和个人能力,而非基于标准化证据的管理。近年来,这种情况有所改变,许多运动整脊疗法从业者开始在循证的旗帜下开展工作,并接受研究文化。尽管运动整脊疗法运动最近有了发展,但该行业仍受到少数从业者的困扰,他们继续支持某些边缘化和古怪的技术体系,这给作为一个有凝聚力和同质性群体的运动整脊疗法主流核心带来了麻烦。现代整脊疗法管理通常具有多模式性质,包括被动和主动护理的组成部分。这种管理通常包括脊柱和外周的手法治疗、松动术、软组织技术、康复和治疗性锻炼。在外部,运动整脊疗法也面临障碍,未得到有组织的正统运动医学团体的认可和接受。虽然由于其历史包袱,一些反对将整脊疗法纳入的论点可能是合理的,但许多论点似乎是反竞争的、缺乏安全感的,并且是由排他心态驱动的。因此,整脊疗法作为一个职业在有组织的运动医学领域仍然是个异类。此外,还有继续教育体系不确定、“运动整脊师”头衔缺乏保护、缺乏公认的专家地位以及缺乏传统整脊疗法的支持等问题,运动整脊师的成长和被接受面临的挑战相当大。本文概述了澳大利亚运动整脊疗法在内部和外部面临的历史和当前挑战,并提出了积极的变革建议,这将有助于运动整脊疗法在整脊疗法和多学科运动医学中得到认可和纳入。