Limon Agenor, Reyes-Ruiz Jorge Mauricio, Eusebi Fabrizio, Miledi Ricardo
Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4550, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 25;104(39):15526-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706773104. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
Anatomical visualization of neurotransmitter receptor localization is facilitated by tagging receptors, but this process can alter their functional properties. We have evaluated the distribution and properties of WT glutamate receptor 3 (GluR3) alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptors (WT GluR3) and two receptors in which GFP was tagged to the amino terminus (GFP-GluR3) or to the carboxyl terminus (GluR3-GFP). Although the fluorescence in Xenopus oocytes was stronger in the vegetal hemisphere because of localization of internal structures (probable sites of production, storage or recycling of receptors), the insertion of receptors into the plasma membrane was polarized to the animal hemisphere. The fluorescence intensity of oocytes injected with GluR3-GFP RNA was approximately double that of oocytes injected with GFP-GluR3 RNA. Accordingly, GluR3-GFP oocytes generated larger kainate-induced currents than GFP-GluR3 oocytes, with similar EC(50) values. Currents elicited by glutamate, or AMPA coapplied with cyclothiazide, were also larger in GluR3-GFP oocytes. The glutamate- to kainate-current amplitude ratios differed, with GluR3-GFP being activated more efficiently by glutamate than the WT or GFP-GluR3 receptors. This pattern correlates with the slower decay of glutamate-induced currents generated by GluR3-GFP receptors. These changes were not observed when GFP was tagged to the amino terminus, and these receptors behaved like the WT. The antagonistic effects of 6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo[f]quinoxaline-2,3-dione (NBQX) and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) were not altered in any of the tagged receptors. We conclude that GFP is a useful and convenient tag for visualizing these proteins. However, the effects of different sites of tag insertion on receptor characteristics must be taken into account in assessing the roles played by these receptor proteins.
通过标记受体有助于对神经递质受体定位进行解剖学可视化,但这一过程可能会改变其功能特性。我们评估了野生型谷氨酸受体3(GluR3)α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)受体(野生型GluR3)以及两种分别在氨基末端(GFP-GluR3)或羧基末端(GluR3-GFP)标记绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的受体的分布和特性。尽管由于内部结构(受体可能的产生、储存或循环位点)的定位,非洲爪蟾卵母细胞中的荧光在植物半球更强,但受体插入质膜的过程在动物半球是极化的。注射了GluR3-GFP RNA的卵母细胞的荧光强度大约是注射了GFP-GluR3 RNA的卵母细胞的两倍。相应地,GluR3-GFP卵母细胞产生的海人酸诱导电流比GFP-GluR3卵母细胞更大,且半数有效浓度(EC50)值相似。在GluR3-GFP卵母细胞中,谷氨酸或与环噻嗪共同施加的AMPA所引发的电流也更大。谷氨酸与海人酸电流幅度之比有所不同,GluR3-GFP比野生型或GFP-GluR3受体更易被谷氨酸激活。这种模式与GluR3-GFP受体产生的谷氨酸诱导电流的较慢衰减相关。当GFP标记在氨基末端时未观察到这些变化,且这些受体的表现与野生型相似。6-硝基-7-氨磺酰基苯并[f]喹喔啉-2,3-二酮(NBQX)和6-氰基-7-硝基喹喔啉-2,3-二酮(CNQX)的拮抗作用在任何一种标记受体中均未改变。我们得出结论,GFP是用于可视化这些蛋白质的一种有用且便捷的标签。然而,在评估这些受体蛋白所起的作用时,必须考虑标签插入不同位点对受体特性的影响。