Luconi Roberta, Bartolini Marco, Taffi Ruja, Vignini Arianna, Mazzanti Laura, Provinciali Leandro, Silvestrini Mauro
Department of Neuroscience, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Headache. 2007 Sep;47(8):1118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00807.x.
The aim of this study was to assess whether the psychological profile may have prognostic significance in chronic migraine patients.
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 was used for the psychological assessment of patients with chronic migraine to explore personality traits. Patients with psychiatric disease and medication overuse were excluded. One hundred and two patients completed the study. Migraine-related disability was measured using the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire at baseline (T(0)) and again after 2 years (T(1)), during which patients received prophylactic treatment for migraine. At T(1) patients were classified into those exhibiting significant improvement (group 1: scores reduced by at least 50%) and those with unsatisfactory changes in headache-related disability (group 2: scores reduced by less than 50%).
At T(1) 49 patients were in group 1 and 53 in group 2; at T(0), group 1 patients had significantly lower Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 scores in the neurotic (hypochondriasis: P < .01; depression: P < .001; hysteria: P < .01) and schizophrenia (P < .05) scales. None of the other variables studied, ie, age, sex, age at migraine onset, number of years from chronic migraine onset, T(0) Migraine Disability Assessment score, T(0) headache frequency, severity and temporal pattern (continuous vs intermittent) differed significantly between the groups.
Findings suggest that psychological factors can influence the clinical course of chronic migraine and that psychological evaluation with Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 may be a reliable approach to obtain prognostic data and information for therapy planning in patients with chronic migraine.
本研究旨在评估心理特征在慢性偏头痛患者中是否具有预后意义。
使用明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版对慢性偏头痛患者进行心理评估,以探索人格特质。排除患有精神疾病和药物滥用的患者。102例患者完成了研究。在基线时(T(0))以及2年后(T(1))使用偏头痛残疾评估问卷测量偏头痛相关残疾,在此期间患者接受偏头痛预防性治疗。在T(1)时,将患者分为表现出显著改善的患者(第1组:分数降低至少50%)和头痛相关残疾变化不理想的患者(第2组:分数降低少于50%)。
在T(1)时,第1组有49例患者,第2组有53例患者;在T(0)时,第1组患者在神经质(疑病症:P <.01;抑郁:P <.001;癔症:P <.01)和精神分裂症(P <.05)量表上的明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版分数显著更低。所研究的其他变量,即年龄、性别、偏头痛发病年龄、慢性偏头痛发病后的年数、T(0)偏头痛残疾评估分数、T(0)头痛频率、严重程度和时间模式(持续型与间歇型)在两组之间均无显著差异。
研究结果表明心理因素可影响慢性偏头痛的临床病程,并且使用明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版进行心理评估可能是为慢性偏头痛患者获取预后数据和用于治疗规划信息的可靠方法。