Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, the MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Headache. 2019 Jan;59(1):19-31. doi: 10.1111/head.13429. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Nonpharmacological interventions, such as biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, and relaxation techniques are Level-A evidence-based treatments for headache. The impact of these interventions is often equivalent to or greater than pharmacological interventions, with fewer side effects. Despite such evidence, the rate of participation in nonpharmacological interventions for headache remains low. Once obstacles to optimizing use of behavioral interventions, such as local access to nonpharmacological treatment and primary headache providers are traversed, identification of barriers contributing to low adherence is imperative given the high levels of disability and cost associated with treating headache disorders. In this review of factors in adults associated with underuse of nonpharmacological interventions, we discuss psychological factors relevant to participation in nonpharmacological treatment, including attitudes and beliefs, motivation for change, awareness of triggers, locus of control, self-efficacy, acceptance, coping styles, personality traits, and psychiatric comorbidities associated with treatment adherence. Finally, future prospects and approaches to optimizing treatment matching and minimizing adherence issues are addressed.
An interdisciplinary team conducted this narrative review. Neuropsychologists conducted a literature search during the month of July 2017 using a combination of the keywords ("headache" or "migraine") and ("adherence" or "compliance") or "barriers to treatment" or various "psychological factors" discussed in this narrative review. Content experts, a psychiatrist, and a complementary and integrative health specialist provided additional commentary and input to this narrative review resulting in integration of additional noteworthy studies, book chapters and books.
Various psychological factors, such as attitudes and beliefs, lack of motivation, poor awareness of triggers, external locus of control, poor self-efficacy, low levels of acceptance, and engagement in maladaptive coping styles can contribute to nonadherence.
To maximize adherence, clinicians can assess and address an individual's level of treatment acceptance, beliefs that may present as barriers, readiness for change, locus of control, self-efficacy and psychiatric comorbidities. Identification of barriers to adherence as well as the application of relevant assessment and intervention techniques have the potential to facilitate adherence and ultimately improve treatment success.
背景/目的:非药物干预措施,如生物反馈、认知行为疗法和放松技术,是头痛的 A 级循证治疗方法。这些干预措施的效果通常与药物干预相当,甚至更大,而且副作用更少。尽管有这样的证据,但头痛患者参与非药物干预的比例仍然很低。一旦克服了优化行为干预措施使用的障碍,如当地获得非药物治疗和原发性头痛提供者的障碍,鉴于与治疗头痛障碍相关的高残疾和高成本,确定导致低依从性的障碍就变得至关重要。在对成年人中与非药物干预措施使用不足相关的因素进行综述时,我们讨论了与非药物治疗参与相关的心理因素,包括态度和信念、改变的动机、对触发因素的认识、控制源、自我效能感、接受度、应对方式、人格特质以及与治疗依从性相关的精神共病。最后,讨论了优化治疗匹配和最小化依从性问题的未来前景和方法。
一个跨学科团队进行了这篇叙述性综述。神经心理学家在 2017 年 7 月期间使用了组合关键词(“头痛”或“偏头痛”)和(“依从性”或“顺应性”)或“治疗障碍”或本文叙述性综述中讨论的各种“心理因素”进行了文献检索。内容专家、精神科医生和补充与整合健康专家对这篇叙述性综述提供了额外的评论和意见,从而纳入了更多值得注意的研究、章节和书籍。
各种心理因素,如态度和信念、缺乏动力、对触发因素认识不足、外部控制源、自我效能感差、接受度低以及采用适应不良的应对方式,都可能导致不依从。
为了最大限度地提高依从性,临床医生可以评估和解决患者的治疗接受程度、可能表现为障碍的信念、改变的准备程度、控制源、自我效能感和精神共病。识别依从性障碍以及应用相关评估和干预技术有可能促进依从性,并最终提高治疗成功率。