Johnstone Carolyn C, Rattray Janice, Myers Liz
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Sep-Oct;12(5):219-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00238.x.
Currently, medical and surgical wards tend to have a higher number of sicker and more dependent patients. There is also a growing recognition that several indicators of acute deterioration are being missed, leading to adverse consequences for the patients. As a result, many initiatives have been designed to try to reduce these consequences, including the development of early warning scoring or track and trigger systems and medical response and critical care outreach teams. This paper briefly discusses the risk factors associated with acute deterioration, the use of early warning scoring or track and trigger systems and the role of outreach teams. The aim of this paper is to discuss the development and subsequent implementation of early warning scoring systems (EWS) or track and trigger systems. It will also discuss the associated organizational changes; the main organizational change discussed will be the introduction outreach teams. For this paper, a pragmatic search strategy was implemented using the following terms: early warning score and scoring, track and trigger systems, decision-making tools, critical care outreach and medical emergency teams. The databases used included CINHAL (1997-2007), Medline, Blackwell Synergy and Science Direct, as these would enable the retrieval of relevant literature in the area of triggering of response to acute deterioration in clinical condition. A 10-year limit was initially set, although review of the literature identified resulted in a widening of this to include some of the relevant (and occasionally more dated) literature referred to in these papers. A total of 645 were accessed; of these 135 were retrieved as they appeared to meet the inclusion criteria, but only 35 have been included in this review. The term decision-making tools accounted for the largest number (500), but most of these were irrelevant. EWS are not always used to their full potential, raising the question of their impact. The impact of outreach teams and medical emergency teams has yet to be fully defined. For clinical practice, this means that care must be taken when developing and implementing these changes. The rigour of the development process needs to be considered along with reflection upon how to best meet local requirements.
目前,内科和外科病房往往收治病情更重、依赖性更强的患者。人们也越来越认识到,一些急性病情恶化的指标被漏诊,给患者带来了不良后果。因此,已设计出许多举措来试图减少这些后果,包括开发早期预警评分系统或追踪与触发系统,以及组建医疗应急和重症监护外展团队。本文简要讨论与急性病情恶化相关的风险因素、早期预警评分系统或追踪与触发系统的使用,以及外展团队的作用。本文旨在探讨早期预警评分系统(EWS)或追踪与触发系统的开发及后续实施情况。还将讨论相关的组织变革;所讨论的主要组织变革将是引入外展团队。在撰写本文时,采用了以下术语实施了务实的检索策略:早期预警评分与计分、追踪与触发系统、决策工具、重症监护外展和医疗应急团队。所使用的数据库包括CINHAL(1997 - 2007年)、Medline、Blackwell Synergy和ScienceDirect,因为这些数据库能够检索到临床病情急性恶化反应触发领域的相关文献。最初设定了10年的时间限制,不过对检索到的文献进行审查后,范围有所扩大,纳入了这些论文中提及的一些相关(偶尔也有更陈旧的)文献。共检索到645篇文献;其中135篇因似乎符合纳入标准而被获取,但本综述仅纳入了35篇。“决策工具”这一术语的文献数量最多(500篇),但其中大多数都不相关。EWS并未总是得到充分利用,这引发了其影响的问题。外展团队和医疗应急团队的影响尚未完全明确。对于临床实践而言,这意味着在开发和实施这些变革时必须谨慎。需要考虑开发过程的严谨性,并思考如何最好地满足当地需求。