Brosnan Sarah F, Jones Owen D, Lambeth Susan P, Mareno Mary Catherine, Richardson Amanda S, Schapiro Steven J
Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 9;17(19):1704-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.059. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
Human behavior is not always consistent with standard rational choice predictions. Apparent deviations from rational choice predictions provide a promising arena for the merger of economics and biology [1-6]. Although little is known about the extent to which other species exhibit these seemingly irrational patterns [7-9], similarities across species would suggest a common evolutionary root to the phenomena. The present study investigated whether chimpanzees exhibit an endowment effect, a seemingly paradoxical behavior in which humans tend to value a good they have just come to possess more than they would have only a moment before [10-13]. We show the first evidence that chimpanzees do exhibit an endowment effect, by favoring items they just received more than their preferred items that could be acquired through exchange. Moreover, the effect is stronger for food than for less evolutionarily salient objects, perhaps because of historically greater risks associated with keeping a valuable item versus attempting to exchange it for another [14, 15]. These findings suggest that many seeming deviations from rational choice predictions may be common to humans and chimpanzees and that the evaluation of these through a lens of evolutionary relevance may yield further insights in humans and other species.
人类行为并不总是与标准的理性选择预测相一致。与理性选择预测的明显偏差为经济学与生物学的融合提供了一个充满前景的领域[1 - 6]。尽管对于其他物种表现出这些看似非理性模式的程度知之甚少[7 - 9],但物种间的相似性表明这些现象有着共同的进化根源。本研究调查了黑猩猩是否表现出禀赋效应,这是一种看似自相矛盾的行为,即人类往往会更看重他们刚刚获得的物品,而不是片刻之前他们可能拥有的物品[10 - 13]。我们首次证明黑猩猩确实表现出禀赋效应,它们更倾向于自己刚得到的物品,而不是那些可以通过交换获得的它们更喜欢的物品。此外,这种效应在食物方面比在进化上不太突出的物品上更强,这可能是因为从历史角度来看,保留一件有价值的物品比试图用它交换另一件物品面临更大的风险[14, 15]。这些发现表明,许多看似与理性选择预测的偏差可能在人类和黑猩猩中都很常见,并且通过进化相关性的视角来评估这些偏差可能会在人类和其他物种中产生进一步的见解。