Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650, USA.
Comparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Biol Lett. 2023 Jun;19(6):20230179. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0179. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
When facing uncertainty, humans often build mental models of alternative outcomes. Considering diverging scenarios allows agents to respond adaptively to different actual worlds by developing contingency plans (covering one's bases). In a pre-registered experiment, we tested whether chimpanzees () prepare for two mutually exclusive possibilities. Chimpanzees could access two pieces of food, but only if they successfully protected them from a human competitor. In one condition, chimpanzees could be certain about which piece of food the human experimenter would attempt to steal. In a second condition, either one of the food rewards was a potential target of the competitor. We found that chimpanzees were significantly more likely to protect both pieces of food in the second relative to the first condition, raising the possibility that chimpanzees represent and prepare effectively for different possible worlds.
当面临不确定性时,人类通常会构建替代结果的心理模型。考虑不同的情景可以让主体通过制定应急计划(未雨绸缪)来适应不同的实际世界。在一项预先注册的实验中,我们测试了黑猩猩是否为两种相互排斥的可能性做准备。黑猩猩可以获得两块食物,但前提是它们成功地将食物保护起来,免受人类竞争者的抢夺。在一种情况下,黑猩猩可以确定人类实验者将试图抢夺哪一块食物。在第二种情况下,两块食物奖励中的任意一块都可能成为竞争者的目标。我们发现,黑猩猩在第二种情况下保护两块食物的可能性明显高于第一种情况,这表明黑猩猩能够有效地代表和准备不同的可能世界。