一项系统评价强调了癌症试验参与障碍研究中有效性面临的威胁。

A systematic review highlights threats to validity in studies of barriers to cancer trial participation.

作者信息

Fayter Debra, McDaid Catriona, Eastwood Alison

机构信息

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;60(10):990-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Jul 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the barriers, modifiers, and benefits involved in participating in randomized controlled trials of cancer therapies as perceived by health care providers and patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify published and unpublished studies in any language using electronic databases searched from 1996 to 2004, contact with experts, and reference lists. All study designs were acceptable provided relevant data were reported. Two reviewers were involved in the selection of studies, data extraction, and quality assessment processes. Studies were combined in a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and represented the perspective of the patient or the health care provider or both. Although a range of barriers to trial participation were identified, a number of threats to the internal and external validity of the included studies limited interpretation of the evidence.

CONCLUSION

The limitations within the evidence base do not permit a clear interpretation of the barriers, moderators, and benefits involved in participation in cancer trials. We recommend that trialists prospectively identify the issues relevant to a particular trial using the current research as a starting point. We report checklists to guide this process.

摘要

目的

探讨医疗服务提供者和患者所认为的参与癌症治疗随机对照试验涉及的障碍、影响因素和益处。

研究设计与背景

我们对文献进行了系统回顾,通过检索1996年至2004年的电子数据库、联系专家以及查阅参考文献列表,来识别任何语言的已发表和未发表研究。只要报告了相关数据,所有研究设计均被接受。两名评审员参与了研究的选择、数据提取和质量评估过程。研究通过叙述性综合进行合并。

结果

56项研究符合纳入标准,代表了患者或医疗服务提供者或两者的观点。尽管确定了一系列参与试验的障碍,但纳入研究的内部和外部有效性存在一些威胁,限制了对证据的解释。

结论

证据基础中的局限性使得无法对参与癌症试验涉及的障碍、调节因素和益处进行清晰解释。我们建议试验者以前期研究为起点,前瞻性地确定与特定试验相关的问题。我们报告了指导这一过程的清单。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索