Suppr超能文献

患者对抗抑郁药的认知:不依从性的线索?

Patients' representations of antidepressants: a clue to nonadherence?

作者信息

Piguet Valérie, Cedraschi Christine, Dumont Patricia, Desmeules Jules, Allaz Anne-Françoise, Dayer Pierre

机构信息

University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2007 Oct;23(8):669-75. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181384f59.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Antidepressants are prescribed frequently to chronic pain patients due to their pain relief effects. This medication raises major adherence issues. Despite the adverse effects, little is known about the factors that may jeopardize adherence in chronic pain patients. We carried out a qualitative study to investigate chronic pain patients' representations of antidepressants as compared with pain-free controls.

METHODS

One hundred thirteen chronic pain patients recruited in a multidisciplinary pain clinic and 62 matched controls were questioned with standardized semistructured interviews. The interviews were submitted to content analysis.

RESULTS

Ambivalence emerged as an important aspect of "patients" and controls' views about antidepressants. Antidepressants were described as potent chemicals acting in the brain, possibly causing effects on cognition, emotions, and personality, and inducing dependence and loss of control. Positive effects were mentioned, but when respondents related their own views and experiences, the statements became less favorable. Another key point was that neither the representations of the patients and nor those of the controls comprised the analgesic properties of antidepressants.

DISCUSSION

Chronic pain patients' representations differed only little from those of controls. Antidepressants were not considered as addressing somatic problems. Thus, the prescription of antidepressants for chronic pain may be mistaken for a denial of the "reality" of pain. Although this study did not assess medication adherence, it is possible that patient representations have a bearing on adherence. Clinically, this suggests that these representations should be elicited and addressed, taking into account the patients' own models of pain.

摘要

目的

由于具有止痛效果,抗抑郁药经常被开给慢性疼痛患者。这种药物引发了严重的依从性问题。尽管存在副作用,但对于可能危及慢性疼痛患者依从性的因素却知之甚少。我们进行了一项定性研究,以调查慢性疼痛患者与无疼痛对照组对抗抑郁药的认知情况。

方法

在一个多学科疼痛诊所招募了113名慢性疼痛患者,并对62名匹配的对照组进行了标准化半结构化访谈。访谈内容进行了内容分析。

结果

矛盾心理成为患者和对照组对抗抑郁药看法的一个重要方面。抗抑郁药被描述为作用于大脑的强效化学物质,可能对认知、情绪和性格产生影响,并导致依赖和失控。虽然提到了积极作用,但当受访者讲述自己的观点和经历时,评价就变得不那么积极了。另一个关键点是,患者和对照组的认知中均未包含抗抑郁药的止痛特性。

讨论

慢性疼痛患者的认知与对照组的认知差异不大。抗抑郁药未被视为解决躯体问题的药物。因此,为慢性疼痛患者开抗抑郁药可能被误解为对疼痛“现实”的否认。尽管本研究未评估药物依从性,但患者的认知可能与依从性有关。在临床上,这表明应该考虑患者自身的疼痛模式,引出并解决这些认知问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验