Holman Rury R, Thorne Kerensa I, Farmer Andrew J, Davies Melanie J, Keenan Joanne F, Paul Sanjoy, Levy Jonathan C
Diabetes Trials Unit, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1716-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa075392. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
Adding insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus is customary when glycemic control is suboptimal, though evidence supporting specific insulin regimens is limited.
In an open-label, controlled, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 708 patients with a suboptimal glycated hemoglobin level (7.0 to 10.0%) who were receiving maximally tolerated doses of metformin and sulfonylurea to receive biphasic insulin aspart twice daily, prandial insulin aspart three times daily, or basal insulin detemir once daily (twice if required). Outcome measures at 1 year were the mean glycated hemoglobin level, the proportion of patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5% or less, the rate of hypoglycemia, and weight gain.
At 1 year, mean glycated hemoglobin levels were similar in the biphasic group (7.3%) and the prandial group (7.2%) (P=0.08) but higher in the basal group (7.6%, P<0.001 for both comparisons). The respective proportions of patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5% or less were 17.0%, 23.9%, and 8.1%; respective mean numbers of hypoglycemic events per patient per year were 5.7, 12.0, and 2.3; and respective mean weight gains were 4.7 kg, 5.7 kg, and 1.9 kg. Rates of adverse events were similar among the three groups.
A single analogue-insulin formulation added to metformin and sulfonylurea resulted in a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5% or less in a minority of patients at 1 year. The addition of biphasic or prandial insulin aspart reduced levels more than the addition of basal insulin detemir but was associated with greater risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51125379 [controlled-trials.com].).
当2型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳时,在口服治疗基础上加用胰岛素是常见做法,不过支持特定胰岛素治疗方案的证据有限。
在一项开放标签、对照、多中心试验中,我们将708例糖化血红蛋白水平不佳(7.0%至10.0%)且正在接受最大耐受剂量二甲双胍和磺脲类药物治疗的患者随机分组,分别接受每日两次双相门冬胰岛素治疗、每日三次餐时门冬胰岛素治疗或每日一次(必要时每日两次)地特胰岛素基础胰岛素治疗。1年时的结局指标包括平均糖化血红蛋白水平、糖化血红蛋白水平在6.5%及以下的患者比例、低血糖发生率和体重增加情况。
1年时,双相胰岛素组(7.3%)和餐时胰岛素组(7.2%)的平均糖化血红蛋白水平相似(P = 0.08),但基础胰岛素组更高(7.6%,两组比较P均<0.001)。糖化血红蛋白水平在6.5%及以下的患者比例分别为17.0%、23.9%和8.1%;患者每年平均低血糖事件数分别为5.7次、12.0次和2.3次;平均体重增加分别为4.7 kg、5.7 kg和1.9 kg。三组不良事件发生率相似。
在二甲双胍和磺脲类药物基础上加用单一胰岛素类似物制剂,1年时少数患者糖化血红蛋白水平降至6.5%及以下。加用双相或餐时门冬胰岛素比加用地特胰岛素基础胰岛素能更多降低糖化血红蛋白水平,但低血糖和体重增加风险更高。(当前对照试验编号,ISRCTN51125379 [controlled-trials.com]。)