Giesbrecht Barry, Sy Jocelyn L, Elliott James C
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Dec;19(12):2005-18. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2005.
When two masked targets are presented in rapid succession, correct identification of the first target (T1) leads to a dramatic impairment in identification of the second target (T2). Several studies of this so-called attentional blink (AB) phenomenon have provided behavioral and physiological evidence that T2 is processed to the semantic level, despite the profound impairment in T2 report. These findings have been interpreted as an example of perception without awareness and have been explained by models that assume that T2 is processed extensively even though it does not gain access into consciousness. The present study reports two experiments that test this assumption. In Experiment 1, the perceptual load of the T1 task was manipulated and T2 was a word that was either related or unrelated to a context word presented at the beginning of each trial. The event-related potential (ERP) technique was used to isolate the context-sensitive N400 component evoked by the T2 word. The ERP data revealed that there was a complete suppression of the N400 during the AB when the perceptual load was high, but not when perceptual load was low. Experiment 2 replicated the high-load condition of Experiment 1 while ruling out two alternative explanations for the reduction of the N400 during the AB. The results of both experiments demonstrate that word meanings are not always accessed during the AB and are consistent with studies that suggest that attention can act to select information at multiple stages of processing depending on concurrent task demands.
当两个带掩蔽的目标相继快速呈现时,对第一个目标(T1)的正确识别会导致对第二个目标(T2)的识别出现显著受损。几项关于这种所谓注意瞬脱(AB)现象 的研究提供了行为和生理学证据,表明尽管T2报告存在严重受损,但T2仍被加工至语义水平。这些发现被解释为无意识知觉的一个例子,并由一些模型进行了解释,这些模型假定T2即使没有进入意识仍被广泛加工。本研究报告了两项检验这一假设的实验。在实验1中,操纵了T1任务的知觉负荷,T2是一个与每次试验开始时呈现的上下文单词相关或不相关的单词。采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术分离由T2单词诱发的上下文敏感N400成分。ERP数据显示,当知觉负荷高时,AB期间N400完全被抑制,而当知觉负荷低时则不然。实验2重复了实验1的高负荷条件,同时排除了AB期间N400降低的两种替代解释。两项实验的结果均表明,AB期间单词意义并非总是被通达,并且与一些研究一致,这些研究表明,注意力可以根据并发任务需求在多个加工阶段选择信息。