Eo Kangyong, Cha Oakyoon, Chong Sang Chul, Kang Min-Suk
Graduate Program in Cognitive Science and.
Graduate Program in Cognitive Science and Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
J Neurosci. 2016 May 18;36(20):5489-97. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3018-15.2016.
The extent of unconscious semantic processing has been debated. It is well established that semantic information is registered in the absence of awareness induced by inattention. However, it has been debated whether semantic information of invisible stimuli is processed during interocular suppression, a procedure that renders one eye's view invisible by presenting a dissimilar stimulus to the other eye. Inspired by recent evidence demonstrating that reduced attention attenuates interocular suppression, we tested a counterintuitive hypothesis that attention withdrawn from the suppressed target location facilitates semantic processing in the absence of awareness induced by interocular suppression. We obtained an electrophysiological marker of semantic processing (N400 component) while human participants' spatial attention was being manipulated with a cueing paradigm during interocular suppression. We found that N400 modulation was absent when participants' attention was directed to the target location, but present when diverted elsewhere. In addition, the correlation analysis across participants indicated that the N400 amplitude was reduced with more attention being directed to the target location. Together, these results indicate that inattention attenuates interocular suppression and thereby makes semantic processing available unconsciously, reconciling conflicting evidence in the literature. We discuss a tight link among interocular suppression, attention, and conscious awareness.
Interocular suppression offers a powerful means of studying the extent of unconscious processing by rendering a salient stimulus presented to one eye invisible. Here, we provide evidence that attention is a determining factor for unconscious semantic processing. An electrophysiological marker for semantic processing (N400 component) was present when attention was diverted away from the suppressed stimulus but absent when attention was directed to that stimulus, indicating that inattention facilitates unconscious semantic processing during the interocular suppression. Although contrary to the common sense assumption that attention facilitates information processing, this result is in accordance with recent studies showing that attention modulates interocular suppression but is not necessary for semantic processing. Our finding reconciles the conflicting evidence and advances theories of consciousness.
无意识语义加工的程度一直存在争议。语义信息在因注意力不集中而导致的无意识状态下被记录,这一点已得到充分证实。然而,对于在双眼竞争抑制过程中,不可见刺激的语义信息是否会被加工,一直存在争议。双眼竞争抑制是一种通过向另一只眼睛呈现不同刺激,使一只眼睛的视野不可见的过程。受近期证据的启发,这些证据表明注意力的降低会减弱双眼竞争抑制,我们测试了一个与直觉相反的假设,即从被抑制的目标位置撤回注意力,会在双眼竞争抑制引起的无意识状态下促进语义加工。在双眼竞争抑制期间,我们使用提示范式操纵人类参与者的空间注意力,同时获得语义加工的电生理标记(N400成分)。我们发现,当参与者的注意力指向目标位置时,N400调制不存在,但当注意力转移到其他地方时则存在。此外,对参与者的相关分析表明,随着更多注意力指向目标位置,N400振幅会降低。总之,这些结果表明,注意力不集中会减弱双眼竞争抑制,从而使语义加工在无意识状态下得以进行,调和了文献中的相互矛盾的证据。我们讨论了双眼竞争抑制、注意力和意识觉知之间的紧密联系。
双眼竞争抑制通过使呈现给一只眼睛的显著刺激不可见,提供了一种研究无意识加工程度的有力手段。在这里,我们提供证据表明注意力是无意识语义加工的决定因素。当注意力从被抑制的刺激上转移时,语义加工的电生理标记(N400成分)存在,但当注意力指向该刺激时则不存在,这表明注意力不集中在双眼竞争抑制期间促进了无意识语义加工。尽管这与注意力促进信息加工的常识性假设相反,但这一结果与近期研究一致,这些研究表明注意力调节双眼竞争抑制,但对于语义加工并非必要。我们的发现调和了相互矛盾的证据,并推进了意识理论。