Hoeks Sanne E, Scholte op Reimer Wilma J M, Lenzen Mattie J, van Urk Hero, Jörning Paul J G, Boersma Eric, Simoons Maarten L, Bax Jeroen J, Poldermans Don
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anesthesiology. 2007 Oct;107(4):537-44. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000281892.15637.fb.
The American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery recommend an algorithm for a stepwise approach to preoperative cardiac assessment in vascular surgery patients. The authors' main objective was to determine adherence to the ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative care in daily clinical practice.
Between May and December 2004, data on 711 consecutive peripheral vascular surgery patients were collected from 11 hospitals in The Netherlands. This survey was conducted within the infrastructure of the Euro Heart Survey Programme. The authors retrospectively applied the ACC/AHA guideline algorithm to each patient in their data set and subsequently compared observed clinical practice data with these recommendations.
Although 185 of the total 711 patients (26%) fulfilled the ACC/AHA guideline criteria to recommend preoperative noninvasive cardiac testing, clinicians had performed testing in only 38 of those cases (21%). Conversely, of the 526 patients for whom noninvasive testing was not recommended, guidelines were followed in 467 patients (89%). Overall, patients who had not been tested, irrespective of guideline recommendation, received less cardioprotective medications, whereas patients who underwent noninvasive testing were significantly more often treated with cardiovascular drugs (beta-blockers 43% vs. 77%, statins 52% vs. 83%, platelet inhibitors 80% vs. 85%, respectively; all P < 0.05). Moreover, the authors did not observe significant differences in cardiovascular medical therapy between patients with a normal test result and patients with an abnormal test result.
This survey showed poor agreement between ACC/AHA guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice. Only one of each five patients underwent noninvasive testing when recommended. Furthermore, patients who had not undergone testing despite recommendations received as little cardiac management as the low-risk population.
美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)关于非心脏手术围手术期心血管评估的指南推荐了一种用于血管手术患者术前心脏评估的逐步方法算法。作者的主要目的是确定在日常临床实践中对ACC/AHA围手术期护理指南的遵循情况。
2004年5月至12月期间,从荷兰的11家医院收集了711例连续外周血管手术患者的数据。这项调查是在欧洲心脏调查项目的框架内进行的。作者回顾性地将ACC/AHA指南算法应用于数据集中的每一位患者,随后将观察到的临床实践数据与这些建议进行比较。
虽然711例患者中的185例(26%)符合ACC/AHA指南中推荐术前无创心脏检查的标准,但临床医生仅对其中38例(21%)进行了检查。相反,在不推荐进行无创检查的526例患者中,467例(89%)遵循了指南。总体而言,无论指南建议如何,未接受检查的患者接受的心脏保护药物较少,而接受无创检查的患者接受心血管药物治疗的比例明显更高(β受体阻滞剂分别为43%对77%,他汀类药物为52%对83%,血小板抑制剂为80%对85%;所有P<0.05)。此外,作者未观察到检查结果正常的患者与检查结果异常的患者在心血管药物治疗方面存在显著差异。
这项调查显示ACC/AHA指南建议与日常临床实践之间的一致性较差。推荐时每五名患者中只有一名接受了无创检查。此外,尽管有建议但未接受检查的患者所接受的心脏管理与低风险人群一样少。