• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爬楼梯干预中环境变化的影响:对下楼梯的推广。

Effects of environmental changes in a stair climbing intervention: generalization to stair descent.

作者信息

Webb Oliver J, Eves Frank F

机构信息

School of Life Sciences, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston-Upon-Thames Surrey, England.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(1):38-44. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-22.1.38.

DOI:10.4278/0890-1171-22.1.38
PMID:17894262
Abstract

PURPOSE

Visual improvements have been shown to encourage stair use in worksites independently of written prompts. This study examined whether visual modifications alone can influence behavior in a shopping mall. Climbing one flight of stairs, however, will not confer health benefits. Therefore, this study also assessed whether exposure to the intervention encouraged subsequent stair use.

DESIGN

Interrupted time-series design.

SETTINGS

Escalators flanked by a staircase on either side.

SUBJECTS

Ascending and descending pedestrians (N = 81,948).

INTERVENTIONS

Following baseline monitoring, a colorful design was introduced on the stair risers of one staircase (the target staircase). A health promotion message was superimposed later on top. The intervention was visible only to ascending pedestrians. Thus, any rise in descending stair use would indicate increased intention to use stairs, which endured after initial exposure to the intervention.

MEASURES

Observers inconspicuously coded pedestrians' means of ascent/descent and demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

The design alone had no meaningful impact. Addition of the message, however, increased stair climbing at the target and nontarget staircases by 190% and 52%, respectively. The message also produced a modest increase in stair descent at the target (25%) and nontarget (9%) staircases.

CONCLUSIONS

In public venues, a message component is critical to the success of interventions. In addition, it appears that exposure to an intervention can encourage pedestrians to use stairs on a subsequent occasion.

摘要

目的

研究表明,视觉改善措施能够在不依赖书面提示的情况下,鼓励工作场所的人员使用楼梯。本研究探讨了单纯的视觉改变是否会对购物中心内的行为产生影响。然而,爬一段楼梯并不会带来健康益处。因此,本研究还评估了接触该干预措施是否会促使后续楼梯使用率的提高。

设计

中断时间序列设计。

场所

自动扶梯两侧各有一个楼梯。

受试者

上下楼梯的行人(N = 81,948)。

干预措施

在基线监测之后,在其中一个楼梯(目标楼梯)的梯级上引入了色彩丰富的设计。随后叠加了一条健康促进信息。该干预措施仅对向上走的行人可见。因此,下行楼梯使用率的任何上升都将表明使用楼梯的意愿增强,这种意愿在初次接触干预措施后依然存在。

测量方法

观察者暗中记录行人上下楼梯的方式以及人口统计学特征。

结果

仅设计本身没有显著影响。然而,添加信息后,目标楼梯和非目标楼梯的爬楼梯人数分别增加了190%和52%。该信息还使目标楼梯(25%)和非目标楼梯(9%)的下楼梯人数略有增加。

结论

在公共场所,信息元素对于干预措施的成功至关重要。此外,接触一次干预措施似乎能够促使行人在后续场合使用楼梯。

相似文献

1
Effects of environmental changes in a stair climbing intervention: generalization to stair descent.爬楼梯干预中环境变化的影响:对下楼梯的推广。
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(1):38-44. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-22.1.38.
2
Promoting stair climbing: intervention effects generalize to a subsequent stair ascent.促进爬楼梯:干预效果可推广至后续的楼梯攀登。
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(2):114-9. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-22.2.114.
3
Effectiveness and cost of two stair-climbing interventions-less is more.两种爬楼梯干预措施的效果和成本——少即是多。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(4):231-6. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090325-QUAN-119.
4
Six-month observational study of prompted stair climbing.对提示性爬楼梯的六个月观察性研究。
Prev Med. 2001 Nov;33(5):422-7. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0908.
5
Promoting stair climbing: stair-riser banners are better than posters... sometimes.推广爬楼梯:楼梯竖板横幅有时比海报效果更好。
Prev Med. 2008 Apr;46(4):308-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.009. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
6
A workplace intervention to promote stair climbing: greater effects in the overweight.一项促进爬楼梯的工作场所干预措施:对超重者效果更佳。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Dec;14(12):2210-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.259.
7
A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention.针对工作场所热量消耗的多组件楼梯攀登推广活动;一项准实验研究,测试对行为、态度和意愿的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 11;12:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-423.
8
Review Article: Increasing physical activity with point-of-choice prompts--a systematic review.综述文章:利用选择点提示增加身体活动——系统综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Aug;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494810375865. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
9
Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators: what about escalator climbers?在楼梯和自动扶梯之间的选择点增加身体活动的提示:那自动扶梯攀爬者呢?
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Jul 16;9(4):656-662. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby080.
10
A statistical summary of mall-based stair-climbing interventions.基于商场的爬楼梯干预措施的统计总结。
J Phys Act Health. 2011 May;8(4):558-65. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.4.558.

引用本文的文献

1
Choice architecture interventions to change physical activity and sedentary behavior: a systematic review of effects on intention, behavior and health outcomes during and after intervention.选择架构干预措施对改变身体活动和久坐行为的影响:干预期间和之后对意图、行为和健康结果的系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 7;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00942-7.
2
When weight is an encumbrance; avoidance of stairs by different demographic groups.当体重成为负担时;不同人群回避楼梯。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0228044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228044. eCollection 2020.
3
Nudging to move: a scoping review of the use of choice architecture interventions to promote physical activity in the general population.
推动行动:使用选择架构干预措施促进普通人群身体活动的范围综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Sep 3;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0844-z.
4
Learnt effects of environmental cues on transport-related walking; disrupting habits with health promotion?学习环境线索对与交通相关的步行的影响;用健康促进来打破习惯?
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220308. eCollection 2019.
5
Promoting Stair Climbing as an Exercise Routine among Healthy Older Adults Attending a Community-Based Physical Activity Program.在参加社区体育活动项目的健康老年人中将爬楼梯推广为日常锻炼方式。
Sports (Basel). 2019 Jan 18;7(1):23. doi: 10.3390/sports7010023.
6
Is there any Proffitt in stair climbing? A headcount of studies testing for demographic differences in choice of stairs.爬楼梯时有 Proffitt 吗?对选择楼梯的人口统计学差异进行研究的人数统计。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):71-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0463-7.
7
Development and initial validation of the determinants of physical activity questionnaire.体力活动决定因素问卷的编制与初步验证。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Jun 11;10:74. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-74.
8
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.单病例实验设计:已发表研究和现行标准的系统评价。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):510-50. doi: 10.1037/a0029312. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
Promotion of physical activity using point-of-decision prompts in Berlin underground stations.利用柏林地铁站的决策点提示促进身体活动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Aug;7(8):3063-70. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7083063. Epub 2010 Aug 4.