• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对工作场所热量消耗的多组件楼梯攀登推广活动;一项准实验研究,测试对行为、态度和意愿的影响。

A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention.

机构信息

School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 11;12:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-423.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-423
PMID:22686243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3490976/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accumulation of lifestyle physical activity is a current aim of health promotion, with increased stair climbing one public health target. While the workplace provides an opportunity for regular stair climbing, evidence for effectiveness of point-of-choice interventions is equivocal. This paper reports a new approach to worksite interventions, aimed at changing attitudes and, hence, behaviour.

METHODS

Pre-testing of calorific expenditure messages used structured interviews with members of the public (n = 300). Effects of multi-component campaigns on stair climbing were tested with quasi-experimental, interrupted time-series designs. In one worksite, a main campaign poster outlining the amount of calorific expenditure obtainable from stair climbing and a conventional point-of-choice prompt were used (Poster alone site). In a second worksite, additional messages in the stairwell about calorific expenditure reinforced the main campaign (Poster + Stairwell messages site). The outcome variables were automated observations of stair and lift ascent (28,854) and descent (29,352) at baseline and for three weeks after the intervention was installed. Post-intervention questionnaires for employees at the worksites assessed responses to the campaign (n = 253). Analyses employed Analysis of Variance with follow-up Bonferroni t-tests (message pre-testing), logistic regression of stair ascent and descent (campaign testing), and Bonferroni t-tests and multiple regression (follow-up questionnaire).

RESULTS

Pre-testing of messages based on calorific expenditure suggested they could motivate stair climbing if believed. The new campaign increased stair climbing, with greater effects at the Poster + Stairwell messages site (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.40-1.66) than Posters alone (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.15-1.34). Follow-up revealed higher agreement with two statements about calorific outcomes of stair climbing in the site where they were installed in the stairwell, suggesting more positive attitudes resulted from the intervention. Future intentions for stair use were predicted by motivation by the campaign and beliefs that stair climbing would help weight control.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-component campaigns that target attitudes and intentions may substantially increase stair climbing at work.

摘要

背景

积累生活方式体力活动是当前促进健康的目标,增加爬楼梯是一个公共卫生目标。虽然工作场所提供了定期爬楼梯的机会,但选择干预措施的有效性证据尚无定论。本文报告了一种新的工作场所干预方法,旨在改变态度,从而改变行为。

方法

使用公众(n=300)的结构化访谈对热量消耗信息进行预测试。使用准实验、中断时间序列设计测试多组分运动对爬楼梯的影响。在一个工作场所,使用了一个主要的宣传海报,概述了从爬楼梯中获得的热量消耗,以及一个传统的选择点提示(单独海报工作场所)。在第二个工作场所,楼梯间的额外信息强化了主要运动(海报+楼梯间信息工作场所)。主要结果变量是基线和干预措施安装后三周内自动观察到的楼梯和电梯上升(28854)和下降(29352)。对工作场所的员工进行干预后问卷调查,评估对运动的反应(n=253)。分析采用方差分析,后续 Bonferroni t 检验(信息预测试),逻辑回归爬楼梯上升和下降(运动测试),以及 Bonferroni t 检验和多元回归(随访问卷调查)。

结果

基于热量消耗的信息预测试表明,如果人们相信,它们可以激励爬楼梯。新的运动增加了爬楼梯的次数,在海报+楼梯间信息工作场所的效果更大(OR=1.52,95%置信区间=1.40-1.66),而单独海报(OR=1.24,95%置信区间=1.15-1.34)。后续调查显示,在安装在楼梯间的地点,人们对两条关于爬楼梯热量消耗结果的声明的认同度更高,这表明干预措施产生了更积极的态度。未来使用楼梯的意图由运动的动机和认为爬楼梯有助于控制体重的信念来预测。

结论

针对态度和意图的多组分运动可能会大大增加工作场所的爬楼梯次数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/eea8761bb6ff/1471-2458-12-423-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/dadae6b9c815/1471-2458-12-423-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/fc46a7705ed4/1471-2458-12-423-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/ed628b52015a/1471-2458-12-423-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/eea8761bb6ff/1471-2458-12-423-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/dadae6b9c815/1471-2458-12-423-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/fc46a7705ed4/1471-2458-12-423-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/ed628b52015a/1471-2458-12-423-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b4b/3490976/eea8761bb6ff/1471-2458-12-423-4.jpg

相似文献

1
A multi-component stair climbing promotional campaign targeting calorific expenditure for worksites; a quasi-experimental study testing effects on behaviour, attitude and intention.针对工作场所热量消耗的多组件楼梯攀登推广活动;一项准实验研究,测试对行为、态度和意愿的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 11;12:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-423.
2
Prompt before the choice is made: effects of a stair-climbing intervention in university buildings.选择前的提示:大学建筑中爬楼梯干预的效果。
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 Sep;17(3):631-43. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02060.x. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
3
Specific effects of a calorie-based intervention on stair climbing in overweight commuters.基于卡路里的干预对超重通勤者爬楼梯的具体影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Oct;42(2):257-61. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9283-z.
4
A workplace intervention to promote stair climbing: greater effects in the overweight.一项促进爬楼梯的工作场所干预措施:对超重者效果更佳。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Dec;14(12):2210-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.259.
5
Effectiveness and cost of two stair-climbing interventions-less is more.两种爬楼梯干预措施的效果和成本——少即是多。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(4):231-6. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090325-QUAN-119.
6
Does a video displaying a stair climbing model increase stair use in a worksite setting?视频展示爬楼梯模型能否增加工作场所的楼梯使用?
Public Health. 2017 Aug;149:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Effects of environmental changes in a stair climbing intervention: generalization to stair descent.爬楼梯干预中环境变化的影响:对下楼梯的推广。
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(1):38-44. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-22.1.38.
8
Point-of-Decision Signs and Stair Use in a University Worksite Setting: General Versus Specific Messages.大学工作场所环境中的决策点标识与楼梯使用:通用信息与特定信息
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):291-3. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.120816-ARB-398. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
9
Promoting stair climbing: stair-riser banners are better than posters... sometimes.推广爬楼梯:楼梯竖板横幅有时比海报效果更好。
Prev Med. 2008 Apr;46(4):308-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.009. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
10
A poster-based intervention to promote stair use in blue- and white-collar worksites.一种基于海报的干预措施,用于促进蓝领和白领工作场所的楼梯使用。
Prev Med. 2007 Aug-Sep;45(2-3):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Obesity and food marketing: a narrative review of consumer influence, regulatory gaps, and ethical implications.肥胖与食品营销:关于消费者影响、监管漏洞及伦理影响的叙述性综述
Front Nutr. 2025 Aug 29;12:1645166. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1645166. eCollection 2025.
2
Desk based prompts to replace workplace sitting with stair climbing; a pilot study of acceptability, effects on behaviour and disease risk factors.基于办公桌的提示来取代工作场所的坐姿,改为爬楼梯;可接受性、对行为和疾病风险因素的影响的初步研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):1985. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14393-1.
3
The Power and Peril of Precise vs. Round Health Message Interventions to Increase Stair Use.

本文引用的文献

1
Getting more people on the stairs: the impact of a new message format.让更多人上楼梯:新信息形式的影响。
J Health Psychol. 2001 Sep;6(5):495-500. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600503.
2
Specific effects of a calorie-based intervention on stair climbing in overweight commuters.基于卡路里的干预对超重通勤者爬楼梯的具体影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Oct;42(2):257-61. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9283-z.
3
Effectiveness and cost of two stair-climbing interventions-less is more.两种爬楼梯干预措施的效果和成本——少即是多。
精准与全面的健康信息干预对增加楼梯使用的影响:力量与风险
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 27;12:624198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624198. eCollection 2021.
4
Choice architecture interventions to change physical activity and sedentary behavior: a systematic review of effects on intention, behavior and health outcomes during and after intervention.选择架构干预措施对改变身体活动和久坐行为的影响:干预期间和之后对意图、行为和健康结果的系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 7;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00942-7.
5
Signage Interventions for Stair Climbing at Work: More than 700,000 Reasons for Caution.工作场所楼梯攀爬的标识干预措施:超过 70 万条需要谨慎的理由。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 8;16(19):3782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193782.
6
Learnt effects of environmental cues on transport-related walking; disrupting habits with health promotion?学习环境线索对与交通相关的步行的影响;用健康促进来打破习惯?
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220308. eCollection 2019.
7
Health promotion at the workplace setting: a protocol for a systematic review of effectiveness and sustainability of current practice in low-income and middle-income countries.工作场所的健康促进:对低收入和中等收入国家当前实践的有效性和可持续性进行系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 22;9(5):e027050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027050.
8
Is there sufficient evidence regarding signage-based stair use interventions? A sequential meta-analysis.关于基于标识的楼梯使用干预措施,是否有足够的证据?一项序贯荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 28;7(11):e012459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012459.
9
Promoting workplace stair climbing: sometimes, not interfering is the best.促进职场爬楼梯:有时,不干预就是最好的。
Arch Public Health. 2017 Jan 9;75:2. doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0170-8. eCollection 2017.
10
A multistage controlled intervention to increase stair climbing at work: effectiveness and process evaluation.一项旨在增加工作场所爬楼梯行为的多阶段对照干预措施:效果与过程评估
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 11;13:47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0371-0.
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(4):231-6. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090325-QUAN-119.
4
Economic analysis of physical activity interventions.体力活动干预的经济分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):149-58. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.029.
5
Review Article: Increasing physical activity with point-of-choice prompts--a systematic review.综述文章:利用选择点提示增加身体活动——系统综述。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Aug;38(6):633-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494810375865. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
6
Point-of-decision prompts to increase stair use.
Am J Prev Med. 2010 May;38(5):573-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.004.
7
Stairs instead of elevators at workplace: cardioprotective effects of a pragmatic intervention.工作场所用楼梯代替电梯:一项实用干预措施的心脏保护作用
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Oct;17(5):569-75. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328338a4dd.
8
Point-of-decision prompts to increase stair use. A systematic review update.促进楼梯使用的决策点提示。系统评价更新。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.028.
9
Modelling effects of stair width on rates of stair climbing in a train station.模拟火车站楼梯宽度对爬楼梯速度的影响。
Prev Med. 2008 Sep;47(3):270-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
10
All choices are not equal; effects of context on point-of-choice prompts for stair climbing.并非所有选择都是等同的;情境对楼梯攀爬选择点提示的影响。
Obes Rev. 2008 Jan;9(1):83-4; author reply 85-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00372.x.