Department of Neurology Cerebrovascular Group, the University of Natal Kwazulu, Natal, Durban, South Africa; Department of Vascular Surgery-Cerebrovascular Group, the University of Natal Kwazulu, Natal, Durban, South Africa; Stroke Unit, Entabeni Hospital, Kwazulu, Natal, Durban South Africa.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998 Nov-Dec;7(6):404-13. doi: 10.1016/s1052-3057(98)80124-9.
To determine the clinical syndromes, etiopathogenesis, and prognostic factors in a prospectively evaluated multiethnic young stroke population.
Only first-ever patients with a World Heath Organization definition of stroke and anatomic brain imaging were included. A hierarchy of investigative modalities divided into three tiers was applied and a range of standardized scales scored in each patient. This allowed quantification of clinical deficit, etiopathogenesis, disability, and handicap. Standardized stroke scales included the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS), the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) clinical stroke scale, and TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Study) etiological classification. Disability was measured with the Barthel Index and handicap with the Rankin Scale; cognitive impairment was separately evaluated according to predefined criteria. A prognostication measure was made in some patients with the Cerebral Perfusion Index (CPI).
A total of 236 patients was evaluated of whom 64 were excluded because of no lesion consistent with stroke on brain scanning leaving 172 for analysis. There were 87 women, 85 men, with a mean age of 43.8 years (range, 15 to 49 years). Despite many different predefined symptoms, 38 patients (22%) could not be classified. Hypertension (31%) and smoking (19%) were the most commonly encountered risk factors, with more recently determined risk factors such as infection (6%) and emotional stress (5%) relatively frequent. With respect to etiology, the TOAST category "other" was the most numerous group, numbering 93 of 172 (55%) with prothrombotic states in 25 (15%), vasculitis in 21 (12%), and dissection in 12 (7%) being the most frequent causes. Proportions of the remaining categories were small vessel disease (16%), cardioembolism (13%), large vessel disease (10%), and unknown (6%). X-square analysis for an association between the clinical OCSP and TOAST classifications was not significant. Severity of stroke was generally mild as judged by the CNS and Rankin scales. A high proportion of patients had cognitive impairment (54%). A cerebral perfusion index was possible in 31 patients, most of whom had a medium prognosis.
in this hospital-based consecutive series, most young stroke patients in our region were grouped into nonatherogenic (mostly prothrombotic states, infection asssociated and dissection) and noncardiac causes with a definite or probable cause found in 94%. The wide variety of stroke symptoms recorded in this study underscores the heterogeneity of stroke presentation and caution in the emergent evaluation of patients. Cognitive impairment in the majority of stroke patients in the acute and subacute stroke period has important implications for degree of clinical deficit especially as it applies to stroke scales and treatment trials.
确定前瞻性评估的多种族年轻卒中人群的临床综合征、病因和预后因素。
仅纳入符合世界卫生组织定义的卒中且有解剖学脑影像学证据的首次发病患者。采用分为三级的调查方法层次结构,并对每位患者进行一系列标准化量表评分。这允许量化临床缺损、病因、残疾和残障。标准化卒中量表包括加拿大神经功能量表(CNS)、牛津郡社区卒中项目(OCSP)临床卒中量表和 TOAST(Org 10172 在急性卒中研究中的试验)病因分类。残疾用巴氏指数(Barthel Index)测量,残障用 Rankin 量表(Rankin Scale)测量;认知障碍根据预定义标准分别评估。一些患者采用脑灌注指数(Cerebral Perfusion Index,CPI)进行预后评估。
共评估了 236 例患者,其中 64 例因脑部扫描未见符合卒中的病灶而被排除,余 172 例纳入分析。患者中 87 例为女性,85 例为男性,平均年龄为 43.8 岁(15 至 49 岁)。尽管存在许多不同的预定义症状,但仍有 38 例(22%)无法分类。高血压(31%)和吸烟(19%)是最常见的危险因素,而最近确定的危险因素如感染(6%)和情绪应激(5%)相对较常见。就病因而言,TOAST 类别“其他”是最多的一组,172 例中有 93 例(55%),其中血栓形成前状态 25 例(15%)、血管炎 21 例(12%)和夹层 12 例(7%)最常见。其余类别的比例较小,小血管疾病 16%、心源性栓塞 13%、大血管疾病 10%和不明原因 6%。OCSP 临床分类和 TOAST 分类之间的关联的卡方分析无显著意义。根据 CNS 和 Rankin 量表,卒中的严重程度通常较轻。很大比例的患者有认知障碍(54%)。31 例患者可进行 CPI 检查,其中大多数患者预后中等。
在这项基于医院的连续系列研究中,我们地区的大多数年轻卒中患者被分为非动脉粥样硬化性(主要为血栓形成前状态、感染相关和夹层)和非心源性病因,94%的患者确定或可能存在病因。本研究记录的广泛多样的卒中症状强调了卒中表现的异质性和对患者紧急评估时的谨慎。急性和亚急性卒中期间大多数卒中患者的认知障碍对临床缺损程度有重要影响,特别是对卒中量表和治疗试验的影响。