• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移/疾病复发时间及组织学分化对晚期胃癌患者生存的影响。

Effect of timing of metastasis/disease recurrence and histologic differentiation on survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

作者信息

Patel Pooja R, Yao James C, Hess Kenneth, Schnirer Isac, Rashid Asif, Ajani Jaffer A

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2007 Nov 15;110(10):2186-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23046.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.23046
PMID:17896785
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced gastric cancer have a median survival (MS) of <9 months. It is unclear whether the MS of patients who have advanced cancer at the time of diagnosis (synchronous, Group A) is different from that for patients who develop advanced cancer after curative surgery (metachronous, Group B). It was hypothesized that survival would be similar.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients treated at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center who were in either Group A or Group B were reviewed. Survival of patients was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate hazards ratios that were adjusted for the effects of location of recurrence, histologic differentiation, patient sex and age, the location of the primary tumor, and timing of disease recurrence (Group A or Group B) on survival.

RESULTS

In all, 773 consecutive patients qualified for the analysis. The distribution of age, race, histologic differentiation, and primary tumor location was similar in both groups. The MS of Group A (n = 603 patients) and Group B (n = 170 patients) was the same (7.6 months). Similarly, the location of the primary tumor and patient sex were found to have no impact on survival. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors (World Health Organization grade 3 or 4) were found to have a shorter survival compared with those with well-differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors (grade 1 or 2; P = .004). Patients with distant metastases had a shorter survival (P = .01) than those with locoregional disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The data show that MS is similarly poor in patients with advanced gastric cancer with synchronous metastasis (Group A) or those with metachronous metastasis/disease recurrence (Group B). Poor differentiation and anatomically distant site of metastasis were found to impact MS adversely.

摘要

背景

晚期胃癌患者的中位生存期(MS)小于9个月。目前尚不清楚诊断时即患有晚期癌症的患者(同时性,A组)的中位生存期是否与根治性手术后发生晚期癌症的患者(异时性,B组)不同。研究假设两者生存期相似。

方法

回顾了得克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心接受治疗的A组或B组所有患者的病历。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估患者的生存期。使用Cox比例风险模型计算多变量风险比,并对复发部位、组织学分化程度、患者性别和年龄、原发肿瘤部位以及疾病复发时间(A组或B组)对生存期的影响进行校正。

结果

共有773例连续患者符合分析条件。两组患者的年龄、种族、组织学分化程度和原发肿瘤部位分布相似。A组(n = 603例患者)和B组(n = 170例患者)的中位生存期相同(7.6个月)。同样,原发肿瘤部位和患者性别对生存期无影响。与高分化或中分化肿瘤(1级或2级)患者相比,低分化肿瘤(世界卫生组织3级或4级)患者的生存期较短(P = 0.004)。远处转移患者的生存期(P = 0.01)比局部区域疾病复发患者短。

结论

数据表明,伴有同时性转移的晚期胃癌患者(A组)或伴有异时性转移/疾病复发的患者(B组)的中位生存期同样较差。低分化和远处转移部位对中位生存期有不利影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of timing of metastasis/disease recurrence and histologic differentiation on survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.转移/疾病复发时间及组织学分化对晚期胃癌患者生存的影响。
Cancer. 2007 Nov 15;110(10):2186-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23046.
2
Outcome of gastric cancer patients after successful gastrectomy: influence of the type of recurrence and histology on survival.胃癌患者成功胃切除术后的结局:复发类型和组织学对生存的影响。
Cancer. 2006 Dec 1;107(11):2576-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22317.
3
Adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial conducted by GOIRC.完全切除胃癌的辅助化疗:由GOIRC开展的一项随机III期试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 19;100(6):388-98. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn054. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
4
Asian ethnicity-related differences in gastric cancer presentation and outcome among patients treated at a canadian cancer center.在一家加拿大癌症中心接受治疗的患者中,胃癌表现及预后的亚洲种族相关差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 1;21(11):2070-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.054.
5
Histologic characteristics enhance predictive value of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging in resectable pancreas cancer.组织学特征提高了美国癌症联合委员会分期对可切除胰腺癌的预测价值。
Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4080-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24503.
6
Is detection of asymptomatic recurrence after curative resection associated with improved survival in patients with gastric cancer?胃癌患者根治性切除术后无症状复发的检测是否与生存率提高相关?
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Oct;201(4):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.033.
7
Gastric cancer: correlation between clinicopathological factors and survival of patients (III).胃癌:临床病理因素与患者生存率的相关性(III)
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50(3):369-79.
8
Metachronous hepatic metastases from gastric carcinoma: a multicentric survey.胃癌异时性肝转移:一项多中心调查。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 May;35(5):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.12.017. Epub 2009 Jan 25.
9
Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.肾周脂肪浸润和肿瘤大小在肾细胞癌中的预后意义
J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):486-91; discussion 491. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.034. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
10
Survival benefit of metastasectomy for Krukenberg tumors from gastric cancer.胃癌库肯勃瘤行转移瘤切除术的生存获益
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Aug;94(2):477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning models for predicting one-year survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer who experienced upfront radical gastrectomy.用于预测接受 upfront 根治性胃切除术的转移性胃癌患者一年生存率的机器学习模型。
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Dec 1;9:937242. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.937242. eCollection 2022.
2
Determination of Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients With Distant Lymph Node Metastasis Using Prealbumin Level and Prothrombin Time: Contour Plots Based on Random Survival Forest Algorithm on High-Dimensionality Clinical and Laboratory Datasets.利用前白蛋白水平和凝血酶原时间测定远处淋巴结转移胃癌患者的生存率:基于随机生存森林算法对高维临床和实验室数据集绘制的等高线图
J Gastric Cancer. 2022 Apr;22(2):120-134. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e12.
3
Preoperatively Treated Diffuse-Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Glucose vs. Other Energy Sources Substantially Influence Prognosis and Therapy Response.术前治疗的弥漫型胃腺癌:葡萄糖与其他能量来源对预后和治疗反应有重大影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 23;13(3):420. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030420.
4
Clinical significance of computed tomography-detected ascites in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastases.计算机断层扫描检测到的腹水在伴有腹膜转移的胃癌患者中的临床意义。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(8):e9343. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009343.
5
Nomograms predicting survival of patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer who receive combination cytotoxic chemotherapy as first-line treatment.预测接受一线联合细胞毒化疗的不可切除或转移性胃癌患者生存的列线图。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 May;21(3):453-463. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0756-z. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
6
Comprehension of readmission after laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy: what are the causes?腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术后再入院情况的理解:原因有哪些?
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 May;86(5):237-43. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.86.5.237. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
7
Clinical parameters model for predicting pathologic complete response following preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer.预测食管癌患者术前放化疗后病理完全缓解的临床参数模型。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Oct;23(10):2638-2642. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds210. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
8
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jun;14(6):958-64. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1195-x. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
9
Accomplishments in 2008 in the management of advanced gastroesophageal cancer.2008年晚期胃食管癌管理方面的成就。
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009 Sep;3(5 Supplement 2):S58-61.
10
Factors correlated with peritoneal carcinomatosis and survival in patients with gastric cancer treated at a single institution in Brazil.巴西一家机构治疗的胃癌患者中与腹膜种植转移及生存相关的因素。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug;14(4):326-31. doi: 10.1007/s10147-008-0870-3. Epub 2009 Aug 25.