Graziosi Pedro, Ianni Barbara, Ribeiro Expedito, Perin Marco, Beck Leonardo, Meneghetti Claudio, Mady Charles, Martinez Filho Eulogio, Ramires Jose A F
Heart Institute (InCor) - University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Clinical Division, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2007 Sep 26;5:31. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-5-31.
In patients with advanced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NIC), right-sided cardiac disturbances has prognostic implications. Right coronary artery (RCA) flow pattern and flow reserve (CFR) are not well known in this setting. The purpose of this study was to assess, in human advanced NIC, the RCA phasic flow pattern and CFR, also under right-sided cardiac disturbances, and compare with left coronary circulation. As well as to investigate any correlation between the cardiac structural, mechanical and hemodynamic parameters with RCA phasic flow pattern or CFR.
Twenty four patients with dilated severe NIC were evaluated non-invasively, even by echocardiography, and also by cardiac catheterization, inclusive with Swan-Ganz catheter. Intracoronary Doppler (Flowire) data was obtained in RCA and left anterior descendent coronary artery (LAD) before and after adenosine. Resting RCA phasic pattern (diastolic/systolic) was compared between subgroups with and without pulmonary hypertension, and with and without right ventricular (RV) dysfunction; and also with LAD. RCA-CFR was compared with LAD, as well as in those subgroups. Pearson's correlation analysis was accomplished among echocardiographic (including LV fractional shortening, mass index, end systolic wall stress) more hemodynamic parameters with RCA phasic flow pattern or RCA-CFR.
LV fractional shortening and end diastolic diameter were 15.3 +/- 3.5 % and 69.4 +/- 12.2 mm. Resting RCA phasic pattern had no difference comparing subgroups with vs. without pulmonary hypertension (1.45 vs. 1.29, p = NS) either with vs. without RV dysfunction (1.47 vs. 1.23, p = NS); RCA vs. LAD was 1.35 vs. 2.85 (p < 0.001). It had no significant correlation among any cardiac mechanical or hemodynamic parameter with RCA-CFR or RCA flow pattern. RCA-CFR had no difference compared with LAD (3.38 vs. 3.34, p = NS), as well as in pulmonary hypertension (3.09 vs. 3.10, p = NS) either in RV dysfunction (3.06 vs. 3.22, p = NS) subgroups.
In patients with chronic advanced NIC, RCA phasic flow pattern has a mild diastolic predominance, less marked than in LAD, with no effects from pulmonary artery hypertension or RV dysfunction. There is no significant correlation between any cardiac mechanical-structural or hemodynamic parameter with RCA-CFR or RCA phasic flow pattern. RCA flow reserve is still similar to LAD, independently of those right-sided cardiac disturbances.
在晚期非缺血性心肌病(NIC)患者中,右心功能紊乱具有预后意义。在这种情况下,右冠状动脉(RCA)的血流模式和血流储备(CFR)尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估晚期NIC患者在右心功能紊乱情况下RCA的相位血流模式和CFR,并与左冠状动脉循环进行比较。同时研究心脏结构、机械和血流动力学参数与RCA相位血流模式或CFR之间的相关性。
对24例扩张型重度NIC患者进行了非侵入性评估,包括超声心动图检查,以及通过心脏导管插入术,包括使用Swan-Ganz导管。在使用腺苷前后,获取RCA和左前降支冠状动脉(LAD)的冠状动脉内多普勒(Flowire)数据。比较有和无肺动脉高压、有和无右心室(RV)功能障碍亚组之间静息RCA相位模式(舒张期/收缩期),并与LAD进行比较。将RCA-CFR与LAD以及各亚组进行比较。对超声心动图(包括左心室缩短分数、质量指数、收缩末期壁应力)等更多血流动力学参数与RCA相位血流模式或RCA-CFR进行Pearson相关分析。
左心室缩短分数和舒张末期直径分别为15.3±3.5%和69.4±12.2mm。有和无肺动脉高压亚组之间(1.45对1.29,p=无统计学意义)以及有和无RV功能障碍亚组之间(1.47对1.23,p=无统计学意义)静息RCA相位模式无差异;RCA与LAD相比为1.35对2.85(p<0.001)。任何心脏机械或血流动力学参数与RCA-CFR或RCA血流模式之间均无显著相关性。RCA-CFR与LAD相比无差异(3.38对3.34,p=无统计学意义),在肺动脉高压亚组(3.09对3.10,p=无统计学意义)以及RV功能障碍亚组(3.06对3.22,p=无统计学意义)中也无差异。
在慢性晚期NIC患者中,RCA相位血流模式具有轻度舒张期优势,不如LAD明显,不受肺动脉高压或RV功能障碍影响。任何心脏机械-结构或血流动力学参数与RCA-CFR或RCA相位血流模式之间均无显著相关性。RCA血流储备仍与LAD相似,不受那些右心功能紊乱的影响。