Suppr超能文献

接受临床生理评估患者的右冠状动脉与左冠状动脉的阶段性血流模式。

Phasic flow patterns of right versus left coronary arteries in patients undergoing clinical physiological assessment.

作者信息

Seligman Henry, Nijjer Sukhjinder S, van de Hoef Tim P, de Waard Guus A, Mejía-Rentería Hernán, Echavarria-Pinto Mauro, Shun-Shin Matthew J, Howard James P, Cook Christopher M, Warisawa Takayuki, Ahmad Yousif, Androshchuk Vitaliy, Rajkumar Christopher, Nowbar Alexandra, Kelshiker Mihir A, van Lavieren Martijn A, Meuwissen Martijn, Danad Ibrahim, Knaapen Paul, Sen Sayan, Al-Lamee Rasha, Mayet Jamil, Escaned Javier, Piek Jan J, van Royen Niels, Davies Justin E, Francis Darrel P, Petraco Ricardo

机构信息

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2022 Feb 18;17(15):1260-1270. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00189.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary blood flow in humans is known to be predominantly diastolic. Small studies in animals and humans suggest that this is less pronounced or even reversed in the right coronary artery (RCA).

AIMS

This study aimed to characterise the phasic patterns of coronary flow in the left versus right coronary arteries of patients undergoing invasive physiological assessment.

METHODS

We analysed data from the Iberian-Dutch-English Collaborators (IDEAL) study. A total of 482 simultaneous pressure and flow measurements from 301 patients were included in our analysis.

RESULTS

On average, coronary flow was higher in diastole both at rest and during hyperaemia in both the RCA and LCA (mean diastolic-to-systolic velocity ratio [DSVR] was, respectively, 1.85±0.70, 1.76±0.58, 1.53±0.34 and 1.58±0.43 for LCA, LCA, RCA and RCA, p<0.001 for between-vessel comparisons). Although the type of RCA dominance affected the DSVR magnitude (RCA=1.55±0.35, RCA=1.40±0.27, RCA=1.35; standard deviation not reported as n=3), systolic flow was very rarely predominant (DSVR was greater than or equal to 1.00 in 472/482 cases [97.9%] overall), with equal prevalence in the LCA. Stenosis severity or microvascular dysfunction had a negligible impact on DSVR in both the RCA and LCA (DSVR x hyperaemic stenosis resistance R =0.018, p=0.03 and DSVR x coronary flow reserve R <0.001, p=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with coronary artery disease undergoing physiological assessment, diastolic flow predominance is seen in both left and right coronary arteries. Clinical interpretation of coronary physiological data should therefore not differ between the left and the right coronary systems.

摘要

背景

已知人类冠状动脉血流主要发生在舒张期。对动物和人类的小型研究表明,这种情况在右冠状动脉(RCA)中不太明显甚至相反。

目的

本研究旨在描述接受侵入性生理评估患者左、右冠状动脉血流的阶段性模式。

方法

我们分析了伊比利亚 - 荷兰 - 英语合作研究(IDEAL)的数据。我们的分析纳入了301例患者的总共482次同步压力和血流测量。

结果

平均而言,无论是在静息状态还是充血状态下,RCA和LCA的舒张期冠状动脉血流均较高(LCA、LCA、RCA和RCA的平均舒张期与收缩期速度比[DSVR]分别为1.85±0.70、1.76±0.58、1.53±0.34和1.58±0.43,血管间比较p<0.001)。尽管RCA优势类型影响DSVR大小(RCA = 1.55±0.35,RCA = 1.40±0.27,RCA = 1.35;未报告标准差,因为n = 3),但收缩期血流很少占主导(总体472/482例[97.9%]中DSVR大于或等于1.00),在LCA中患病率相同。狭窄严重程度或微血管功能障碍对RCA和LCA中的DSVR影响可忽略不计(DSVR×充血性狭窄阻力R = 0.018,p = 0.03;DSVR×冠状动脉血流储备R <0.001,p = 0.98)。

结论

在接受生理评估的冠心病患者中,左、右冠状动脉均表现为舒张期血流占优势。因此,冠状动脉生理数据的临床解读在左、右冠状动脉系统之间不应有所不同。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验