Suppr超能文献

比较辛伐他汀和非诺贝特的脂蛋白颗粒分析

Lipoprotein particle analysis comparing simvastatin and fenofibrate.

作者信息

Bard J M, Parra H J, Luc G, Camare R, Ziegler O, Dachet C, Bruckert E, Douste-Blazy P, Drouin P, Jacotot B

机构信息

Serlia, Institut Pasteur, Lille, France.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 1991 Dec;91 Suppl:S29-34. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(91)90204-g.

Abstract

This study compares the effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia, with particular regard to lipoprotein particles, as defined by their apolipoprotein composition: LpAI, LpAII: AI, LpE:B, LpCIII:B. This was a double-blind study in which patients were randomized to 2 groups, one receiving simvastatin 20 mg once daily and the other receiving fenofibrate 200 mg b.i.d., if their total cholesterol and their LDL cholesterol remained above 7.60 mmol/l (300 mg/dl) and 4.95 mmol/l (195 mg/dl) after a 4-week placebo period. Simvastatin dosage was doubled at the end of 6 weeks of therapy if the LDL-cholesterol level remained above 3.55 mmol/l (140 mg/dl). Analyses were done after 6 and 10 weeks of therapy. Apolipoprotein AI was increased significantly only at week 10 with fenofibrate (+7.4%). Simvastatin had a more pronounced effect than fenofibrate on apolipoprotein B. There was a significant difference between drugs at weeks 6 and 10. No change was observed in the LpAII:AI level with simvastatin, whereas fenofibrate increased these particles quite significantly (+13.9 and +22.3%). The drugs had opposite effects on LpAI (+2.5 and +5.6% with simvastatin; -12.8 and -15.1% with fenofibrate). LP E:B (-33.0 and -40.8% with simvastatin; -53.8 and -52.2% with fenofibrate) and LpCIII:B (-23.8 and -31.8% with simvastatin; -35.1 and -43.5% with fenofibrate) were decreased by both drugs, but fenofibrate was significantly more effective in reducing these particles than simvastatin at week 6. This study suggests that both drugs led to different structural modifications of the lipoproteins, which would not be revealed by total apolipoprotein analysis. These differences are probably related to the mechanisms of action of these drugs.

摘要

本研究比较了非诺贝特和辛伐他汀对原发性高胆固醇血症的影响,尤其关注脂蛋白颗粒,这些颗粒由其载脂蛋白组成定义:LpAI、LpAII:AI、LpE:B、LpCIII:B。这是一项双盲研究,患者被随机分为两组,一组每天服用一次20mg辛伐他汀,另一组每天服用两次200mg非诺贝特。若在为期4周的安慰剂期后,患者的总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇仍分别高于7.60mmol/L(300mg/dl)和4.95mmol/L(195mg/dl)。若低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平在治疗6周结束时仍高于3.55mmol/L(140mg/dl),则辛伐他汀剂量在治疗6周结束时加倍。在治疗6周和10周后进行分析。仅在第10周,非诺贝特使载脂蛋白AI显著升高(+7.4%)。辛伐他汀对载脂蛋白B的作用比非诺贝特更显著。在第6周和第10周时,两种药物之间存在显著差异。辛伐他汀治疗时,LpAII:AI水平未观察到变化,而非诺贝特使这些颗粒显著增加(分别为+13.9%和+22.3%)。两种药物对LpAI的影响相反(辛伐他汀分别为+2.5%和+5.6%;非诺贝特分别为-12.8%和-15.1%)。两种药物均使LP E:B(辛伐他汀分别为-33.0%和-40.8%;非诺贝特分别为-53.8%和-52.2%)和LpCIII:B(辛伐他汀分别为-23.8%和-31.8%;非诺贝特分别为-35.1%和-43.5%)降低,但在第6周时,非诺贝特在减少这些颗粒方面比辛伐他汀显著更有效。本研究表明,两种药物导致脂蛋白发生不同的结构改变,而这些改变通过总载脂蛋白分析无法揭示。这些差异可能与这些药物的作用机制有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验