Jansen Theo, Hofmans Marij P M, Theelen Marc J G, Manders Frans G A, Schijns Virgil E J C
Department of Vaccine Technology and Immunology R&D, OrganonBioSciences, Intervet International BV, Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Avian Pathol. 2007 Oct;36(5):361-5. doi: 10.1080/03079450701567395.
The release requirements for vaccine antigens delivered by adjuvants with presumed depot function are poorly understood. Water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions are routinely used in many poultry vaccines. They strongly activate antibody production, and are regarded as a depot from which antigens are slowly released, resulting in prolonged antigen residence. However, from earlier studies we concluded that W/O adjuvant activity is partly based on the immunostimulatory activity of the oil phase. Here we assess the dose and regimen requirements for viral antigen in immunization experiments in chickens. Three-week-old to 4-week-old White Leghorn chickens were repeatedly injected with inactivated infectious bursal disease virus antigen over 48 days. Our aim was to compare the antibody responses in repeatedly injected animals, receiving fractioned doses of antigen, with the responses in animals receiving only one injection of the full dose of antigen formulated in either a W/O emulsion or in saline. We observed that repeated administration of small amounts of antigen results in a gradual increase of specific humoral immune responses during the immunization regimen. Immunization with a higher first dose evoked an early higher antibody response, which, however, reached a similar plateau level at the end of the regimen. When compared with lower first-dose regimens, a slow decline of serum antibody titre 2 weeks after the end of antigen injections indicated that repeated injection of small doses of antigen indeed mimics the efficacy of depot-forming adjuvants. All regimens of fractioned antigen in saline, however, proved less effective, when compared with a single-dose vaccination of the cumulative amount of antigen formulated in a W/O emulsion. From our data we confirm that W/O emulsions are very effective vaccine vehicles for improving antigen-specific humoral responses in chickens, owing to a combination of antigen residence-prolonging activity and direct immune stimulation.
对于具有假定储存功能的佐剂递送的疫苗抗原的释放要求,人们了解甚少。油包水(W/O)乳剂常用于许多禽类疫苗中。它们能强烈激活抗体产生,并被视为一种抗原缓慢释放的储存库,从而使抗原停留时间延长。然而,从早期研究中我们得出结论,W/O佐剂活性部分基于油相的免疫刺激活性。在此,我们在鸡的免疫实验中评估病毒抗原的剂量和方案要求。对3周龄至4周龄的白来航鸡在48天内反复注射灭活的传染性法氏囊病病毒抗原。我们的目的是比较反复注射分剂量抗原的动物与仅接受一次注射以W/O乳剂或生理盐水配制的全剂量抗原的动物的抗体反应。我们观察到,在免疫方案期间,反复给予少量抗原会导致特异性体液免疫反应逐渐增强。首次给予较高剂量抗原会引发早期较高的抗体反应,然而,在方案结束时达到相似的平台水平。与较低的首次剂量方案相比,抗原注射结束后2周血清抗体滴度缓慢下降表明,反复注射小剂量抗原确实模拟了形成储存库的佐剂的功效。然而,与以W/O乳剂配制的抗原累积量的单剂量疫苗接种相比,生理盐水分剂量抗原的所有方案均证明效果较差。从我们的数据中我们证实,由于抗原停留时间延长活性和直接免疫刺激的结合,W/O乳剂是改善鸡的抗原特异性体液反应的非常有效的疫苗载体。