Siner Jonathan M, Manthous Constantine A
Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208057, New Haven, CT 06520-8057, USA.
Crit Care Clin. 2007 Jul;23(3):613-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2007.05.005.
Over the past 2 decades, the art of "weaning" from mechanical ventilation has been informed by increasing published basic science and outcomes studies. Although monitoring technologies can provide vast amounts of information before, during, and after liberation from mechanical ventilation, little data exists on how to maximally harness even routinely monitored, basic physiologic parameters. Overdependence on technology and derived variables, without data to demonstrate benefit, may even inhibit the patient's progress if it is used inappropriately. We review the scientific evidence for best using routinely available physiologic data and a few more sophisticated and invasive monitoring technologies during weaning. We also suggest future study designs that would better inform the process of liberation from the ventilator and endotracheal extubation.
在过去20年里,越来越多已发表的基础科学和结果研究为机械通气“撤机”技术提供了依据。尽管监测技术能够在机械通气撤机前、撤机期间及撤机后提供大量信息,但关于如何最大限度利用甚至是常规监测的基本生理参数的数据却很少。如果使用不当,过度依赖技术和衍生变量而没有数据证明其益处,甚至可能阻碍患者的康复进程。我们回顾了在撤机过程中最佳利用常规可用生理数据以及一些更复杂、侵入性更强的监测技术的科学证据。我们还提出了未来的研究设计,这些设计将为呼吸机撤机和气管插管拔除过程提供更充分的信息。