Suppr超能文献

无创通气以缩短机械通气时间。

Noninvasive ventilation to shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation.

作者信息

Epstein Scott K

机构信息

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2009 Feb;54(2):198-208; discussion 208-11.

Abstract

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) successfully treats primary respiratory failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute pulmonary edema, and, in some patients, hypoxemic respiratory failure. Increasingly clinicians have applied NIV in an effort to shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation by facilitating weaning and preventing or treating post-extubation respiratory failure. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that NIV may be an effective weaning tool in a subset of patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure from COPD, and that applying immediate NIV to extubated patients at high risk for extubation failure improves outcome by decreasing the need for reintubation. In contrast, there is mixed evidence about the effectiveness of NIV to treat established post-extubation respiratory failure. NIV appeared to be ineffective in heterogeneous patient populations in some randomized trials that enrolled relatively few patients with COPD, and a case-control study found that NIV decreased the need for reintubation in this group. Therefore, as with primary therapy, NIV should be considered for patients with COPD and post-extubation respiratory distress.

摘要

无创通气(NIV)可成功治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)所致的原发性呼吸衰竭、急性肺水肿,以及部分患者的低氧性呼吸衰竭。越来越多的临床医生应用NIV,试图通过促进撤机以及预防或治疗拔管后呼吸衰竭来缩短机械通气时间。随机对照试验(RCT)表明,NIV可能是部分慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期呼吸衰竭患者有效的撤机工具,对拔管失败高危的拔管患者立即应用NIV可减少再次插管需求,从而改善预后。相比之下,关于NIV治疗已发生的拔管后呼吸衰竭有效性的证据并不一致。在一些纳入相对较少COPD患者的随机试验中,NIV在异质性患者群体中似乎无效,而一项病例对照研究发现NIV可减少该组患者的再次插管需求。因此,与初始治疗一样,对于COPD和拔管后呼吸窘迫患者应考虑应用NIV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验