Nomura Jason T, Leech Stephen J, Shenbagamurthi Srikala, Sierzenski Paul R, O'Connor Robert E, Bollinger Melissa, Humphrey Margaret, Gukhool Jason A
Department of Emergency Medicine, Christiana Care Hospital, 4755 Ogletown-Stanton Rd, PO Box 6001, Newark, DE 19718, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2007 Oct;26(10):1341-8. doi: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.10.1341.
Evidence showing the systematic utility of ultrasound imaging during lumbar puncture (LP) in the emergency department is lacking. Our hypothesis was that ultrasound-assisted LP would increase the success rate and ease of performing LP with a greater benefit in obese patients.
This was an Institutional Review Board-approved, randomized, prospective, double-blind study conducted at the emergency department of a teaching institution. Patients undergoing LP from January to December 2004 were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to undergo LP using palpation landmarks (PLs) or ultrasound landmarks (ULs). Data collected included age, body mass index, number of attempts, ease of performance and patient comfort on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale, procedure time, success, and traumatic LP. Statistical analysis of data included relative risk (RR), the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Student t test.
A total of 46 patients were enrolled, 22 randomized to PLs and 24 to ULs. There were no differences between the groups in mean age or body mass index. Six of 22 attempts failed with PLs versus 1 of 24 with ULs (RR, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.72). In 12 obese patients, 4 of 7 PL attempts failed versus 0 of 5 UL attempts (RR, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-5.49). The ease of the procedure was better with ULs versus PLs. There were no statistical differences in the number of attempts, traumatic LPs, patient comfort, or procedure length.
The use of ultrasound for LP significantly reduced the number of failures in all patients and improved the ease of the procedure in obese patients.
缺乏证据表明超声成像在急诊科腰椎穿刺(LP)过程中具有系统实用性。我们的假设是,超声辅助腰椎穿刺将提高成功率并使操作更简便,对肥胖患者更有益。
这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的、在一所教学机构急诊科进行的随机、前瞻性、双盲研究。2004年1月至12月接受腰椎穿刺的患者符合入组条件。患者被随机分为使用触诊标志(PLs)或超声标志(ULs)进行腰椎穿刺。收集的数据包括年龄、体重指数、穿刺尝试次数、操作简便程度以及患者在10厘米视觉模拟量表上的舒适度、操作时间、穿刺成功与否及创伤性腰椎穿刺情况。数据的统计分析包括相对风险(RR)、曼-惠特尼U检验和学生t检验。
共纳入46例患者,22例随机分为PLs组,24例分为ULs组。两组间平均年龄或体重指数无差异。PLs组22次穿刺中有6次失败,而ULs组24次中有1次失败(RR,1.32;95%置信区间,1.01 - 1.72)。在12例肥胖患者中,PLs组7次尝试中有4次失败,而ULs组5次尝试中0次失败(RR,2.33;95%置信区间,0.99 - 5.49)。与PLs相比,ULs操作更简便。在穿刺尝试次数、创伤性腰椎穿刺、患者舒适度或操作时长方面无统计学差异。
超声用于腰椎穿刺显著减少了所有患者的穿刺失败次数,并提高了肥胖患者的操作简便程度。