Suppr超能文献

“超引导下诊断性腰椎穿刺(UltraGUD LP)”——一项随机对照试验。在门诊神经科环境中,传统的基于体表标志的腰椎穿刺与超声引导下腰椎穿刺效果相同。

'UltraGUD LP'-ultrasound guided diagnostic LP-a randomizedcontrolled trial. Traditional landmark based lumbar puncture is as effective as ultrasound guided lumbar puncture in outpatient neurology settings.

作者信息

Renga Vijay, Jeffreys Charlotte A, Tabasum Afsha, MacKenzie Todd A

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

Department of Neurology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 10;16:1521783. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1521783. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a fundamental procedure in neurology, yet its success is influenced by patient anatomy and provider expertise. Ultrasound guidance has been shown to improve outcomes in emergency and anesthesia settings, but its effectiveness in outpatient neurology remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study (UltraGUD LP) aimed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided LP (US-LP) versus landmark-based LP (LM-LP) in an outpatient neurology setting, performed by a single experienced provider.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2017 to 2022. Patients requiring LP were randomized to either LM-LP or US-LP. Success was defined as obtaining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within three attempts. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, incidence of traumatic taps, and post-LP headache rates.

RESULTS

Both techniques had comparable success rates, with LM-LP achieving 91% and US-LP 100% ( > 0.05). Procedure time was significantly shorter for LM-LP (13 vs. 19 min,  < 0.05). The incidence of traumatic taps and post-LP headaches was similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

In a general outpatient neurology population, LM-LP is as effective as US-LP and requires less time. While US-LP may be beneficial for high-risk patients (e.g., obesity, prior back surgery), further studies are needed to confirm its superiority in these populations.

摘要

背景

腰椎穿刺(LP)是神经科的一项基本操作,但其成功率受患者解剖结构和操作者专业技能的影响。超声引导已被证明可改善急诊和麻醉环境下的操作结果,但其在门诊神经科的有效性仍不明确。

目的

本研究(UltraGUD LP)旨在比较由单一经验丰富的操作者在门诊神经科环境中进行超声引导下腰椎穿刺(US-LP)与基于体表标志的腰椎穿刺(LM-LP)的有效性。

方法

于2017年至2022年进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。需要进行腰椎穿刺的患者被随机分为LM-LP组或US-LP组。成功定义为在三次尝试内获取脑脊液(CSF)。次要结局包括操作时间、创伤性穿刺的发生率和腰穿后头痛发生率。

结果

两种技术的成功率相当,LM-LP组为91%,US-LP组为100%(>0.05)。LM-LP的操作时间明显更短(13分钟对19分钟,<0.05)。两组间创伤性穿刺和腰穿后头痛的发生率相似。

结论

在普通门诊神经科患者中,LM-LP与US-LP效果相同且所需时间更少。虽然US-LP可能对高危患者(如肥胖、既往有背部手术史)有益,但需要进一步研究以证实其在这些人群中的优越性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验