Voss Susan E, Rosowski John J, Merchant Saumil N, Peake William T
Picker Engineering Program, Smith College, 51 College Lane, Northampton, Massachusetts 01063, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2135-53. doi: 10.1121/1.2769617.
Direct acoustic stimulation of the cochlea by the sound-pressure difference between the oval and round windows (called the "acoustic route") has been thought to contribute to hearing in some pathological conditions, along with the normally dominant "ossicular route." To determine the efficacy of this acoustic route and its constituent mechanisms in human ears, sound pressures were measured at three locations in cadaveric temporal bones [with intact and perforated tympanic membranes (TMs)]: (1) in the external ear canal lateral to the TM, P(TM); (2) in the tympanic cavity lateral to the oval window, P(OW); and (3) near the round window, P(RW). Sound transmission via the acoustic route is described by two concatenated processes: (1) coupling of sound pressure from ear canal to middle-ear cavity, H(P(CAV) ) identical withP(CAV)P(TM), where P(CAV) represents the middle-ear cavity pressure, and (2) sound-pressure difference between the windows, H(WPD) identical with(P(OW)-P(RW))P(CAV). Results show that: H(P(CAV) ) depends on perforation size but not perforation location; H(WPD) depends on neither perforation size nor location. The results (1) provide a description of the window pressures based on measurements, (2) refute the common otological view that TM perforation location affects the "relative phase of the pressures at the oval and round windows," and (3) show with an intact ossicular chain that acoustic-route transmission is substantially below ossicular-route transmission except for low frequencies with large perforations. Thus, hearing loss from TM perforations results primarily from reduction in sound coupling via the ossicular route. Some features of the frequency dependence of H(P(CAV) ) and H(WPD) can be interpreted in terms of a structure-based lumped-element acoustic model of the perforation and middle-ear cavities.
椭圆窗和圆窗之间的声压差对耳蜗的直接声刺激(称为“声学途径”)被认为在某些病理情况下有助于听力,与通常占主导地位的“听骨途径”一起。为了确定这种声学途径及其组成机制在人耳中的功效,在尸体颞骨的三个位置(鼓膜完整和穿孔)测量了声压:(1)在鼓膜外侧的外耳道中,P(TM);(2)在椭圆窗外侧的鼓室中,P(OW);(3)在圆窗附近,P(RW)。通过声学途径的声音传输由两个串联过程描述:(1)从耳道到中耳腔的声压耦合,H(P(CAV) ) 与P(CAV)/P(TM)相同,其中P(CAV)代表中耳腔压力,以及(2)窗之间的声压差,H(WPD) 与(P(OW)-P(RW))/P(CAV)相同。结果表明:H(P(CAV) ) 取决于穿孔大小而不是穿孔位置;H(WPD) 既不取决于穿孔大小也不取决于位置。结果(1)基于测量提供了窗压力的描述,(2)反驳了常见的耳科学观点,即鼓膜穿孔位置会影响“椭圆窗和圆窗处压力的相对相位”,并且(3)表明在听骨链完整的情况下,除了大穿孔的低频外,声学途径传输大大低于听骨途径传输。因此,鼓膜穿孔导致的听力损失主要是由于通过听骨途径的声音耦合减少。H(P(CAV) ) 和H(WPD) 的频率依赖性的一些特征可以根据穿孔和中耳腔的基于结构的集总元件声学模型来解释。