• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经胸食管切除术后采用纤维光学内镜吞咽功能评估法评估误吸情况

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in assessing aspiration after transhiatal esophagectomy.

作者信息

Leder Steven B, Bayar Sancar, Sasaki Clarence T, Salem Ronald R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Oct;205(4):581-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.027
PMID:17903733
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary complications after transhiatal esophagectomy occur commonly and frequently cause severe morbidity and possible mortality. Aspiration, both overt and silent, can also be present with some regularity after this procedure, and it appears intuitive that identification of aspiration with the appropriate measures of avoidance of oral intake and avoidance of oral contrast studies may help reduce the consequences of aspiration pneumonia.

STUDY DESIGN

In an attempt to help identify patients at risk for aspiration, we prospectively studied 73 patients who had recently undergone transhiatal esophagectomy using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Evaluation of premature spillage, pharyngeal residue, pooling, penetration, and aspiration was carried out.

RESULTS

Twenty-one percent of patients showed evidence of aspiration and were kept npo, with deferral of oral contrast studies. Of all the potential predictors of aspiration studied, only vocal fold immobility was a notable predictor of aspiration. But 40% of patients who aspirated had normal vocal fold function. Vocal fold immobility was also identified in several patients thought to have completely normal voice quality. There were no complications of FEES. All patients who demonstrated aspiration and all those with vocal fold immobility eventually demonstrated swallowing without aspiration and recovery of cord function.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of FEES in evaluation of laryngeal function in the postoperative setting after transhiatal esophagectomy. A FEES is recommended before the contrast study or oral feeding challenge for objective determination of aspiration risk from pharyngeal or laryngeal pathology. Early determination of aspiration status may reduce or eliminate pulmonary complications.

摘要

背景

经胸食管切除术术后肺部并发症很常见,常导致严重发病甚至可能死亡。在该手术后,显性和隐性误吸也会经常出现,直观来看,通过适当措施识别误吸并避免经口摄入和避免口服造影剂检查,可能有助于降低误吸性肺炎的后果。

研究设计

为了帮助识别有误吸风险的患者,我们前瞻性地研究了73例近期接受经胸食管切除术的患者,采用纤维内镜吞咽功能评估(FEES)。对过早溢出、咽部残留、积聚、穿透和误吸进行了评估。

结果

21%的患者显示有误吸证据,予以禁食,并推迟口服造影剂检查。在所有研究的误吸潜在预测因素中,只有声带运动障碍是误吸的显著预测因素。但40%有误吸的患者声带功能正常。在一些被认为声音质量完全正常的患者中也发现了声带运动障碍。FEES没有并发症。所有显示有误吸的患者以及所有有声带运动障碍的患者最终都表现出无误吸的吞咽和声带功能恢复。

结论

本研究证明了FEES在经胸食管切除术后评估喉功能中的安全性和有效性。建议在进行造影剂检查或经口进食挑战之前进行FEES,以客观确定咽部或喉部病变导致的误吸风险。早期确定误吸状态可能会减少或消除肺部并发症。

相似文献

1
Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in assessing aspiration after transhiatal esophagectomy.经胸食管切除术后采用纤维光学内镜吞咽功能评估法评估误吸情况
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Oct;205(4):581-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.027.
2
Patterns of swallowing failure following medialization in unilateral vocal fold immobility.单侧声带麻痹内移术后吞咽功能障碍模式
Laryngoscope. 2002 Oct;112(10):1840-4. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200210000-00025.
3
Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing in patients with unilateral vocal fold immobility: incidence and pathophysiology of aspiration.单侧声带麻痹患者吞咽功能的灵活内镜评估及感觉测试:误吸的发生率及病理生理学
Laryngoscope. 2005 Apr;115(4):565-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161358.20450.12.
4
Dysphagia in post-carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study.颈动脉内膜切除术后吞咽困难:一项前瞻性研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 May;21(3):318-20. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.10.023.
5
Laryngeal adductor reflex and pharyngeal squeeze as predictors of laryngeal penetration and aspiration.喉内收肌反射和咽部挤压作为喉穿透和误吸的预测指标。
Laryngoscope. 2002 Feb;112(2):338-41. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200202000-00025.
6
Aspiration risk after acute stroke: comparison of clinical examination and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.急性卒中后的误吸风险:临床检查与吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估比较
Dysphagia. 2002 Summer;17(3):214-8. doi: 10.1007/s00455-002-0054-7.
7
Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare?评估误吸与渗透情况:吞咽的视频荧光造影检查和纤维光学内镜吞咽功能检查结果有何差异?
Laryngoscope. 2007 Oct;117(10):1723-7. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318123ee6a.
8
Immediate percutaneous medialization for acute vocal fold immobility with aspiration.
Laryngoscope. 2001 Aug;111(8):1318-21. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200108000-00002.
9
[The effectiveness of fiberoptic endoscopic swallow study and modified barium swallow study techniques in diagnosis of dysphagia].[纤维光学内镜吞咽检查和改良钡剂吞咽检查技术在吞咽困难诊断中的有效性]
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2005;15(5-6):103-11.
10
Swallowing ability and chronic aspiration after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.环状软骨上喉部分切除术对吞咽功能和慢性误吸的影响
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jun;142(6):873-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.01.035.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in esophagectomy and the incidence of pneumonia and anastomotic leakage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.食管癌切除术中消化道选择性去污与肺炎及吻合口漏发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0325241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325241. eCollection 2025.
2
Perioperative Decrease in Tongue Pressure is an Intervenable Predictor of Aspiration After Esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后围手术期舌压降低是误吸的可干预预测指标。
Dysphagia. 2023 Aug;38(4):1147-1155. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10541-2. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
3
Risk factors and long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with postoperative dysphagia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
食管癌切除术后吞咽困难患者的危险因素及术后长期结局
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Mar 15;6(5):633-642. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12566. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation for adults with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review.基于运动的食管癌成人吞咽障碍康复:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09155-y.
5
Effect of Chin-down-plus-larynx-tightening maneuver on swallowing function after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A randomized controlled trail.头低位联合喉结上提训练对微创食管癌术后吞咽功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(16):5889-5898. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3280. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Patient-reported outcome domains for the esophageal CONDUIT report card: a prospective trial to establish domains.食管 CONDUIT 报告卡的患者报告结局领域:建立领域的前瞻性试验。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Oct 10;16(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1023-7.
7
Presentation of oropharyngeal dysphagia and rehabilitative intervention following esophagectomy: a systematic review.食管癌切除术后口咽吞咽困难的表现及康复干预:一项系统综述
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Aug 1;31(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy050.
8
Videofluoroscopic evaluation of pharyngeal swallowing dysfunction after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection.食管癌切除联合三野淋巴结清扫术后咽吞咽功能障碍的电视荧光吞咽功能评估
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):321-326. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4209-9. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
9
Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales Based on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.基于吞咽功能纤维内镜评估的咽残留严重程度评定量表:一项系统评价
Dysphagia. 2016 Jun;31(3):352-9. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9682-6. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
Clinical predictors of aspiration after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.食管癌患者食管切除术后误吸的临床预测因素
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):295-299. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2776-8. Epub 2015 May 31.