Suppr超能文献

基于吞咽功能纤维内镜评估的咽残留严重程度评定量表:一项系统评价

Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales Based on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Neubauer Paul D, Hersey Denise P, Leder Steven B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208041, New Haven, CT, USA.

Cushing/Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Dysphagia. 2016 Jun;31(3):352-9. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9682-6. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

Abstract

Identification of pharyngeal residue severity located in the valleculae and pyriform sinuses has always been a primary goal during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Pharyngeal residue is a clinical sign of potential prandial aspiration making an accurate description of its severity an important but difficult challenge. A reliable, validated, and generalizable pharyngeal residue severity rating scale for FEES would be beneficial. A systematic review of the published English language literature since 1995 was conducted to determine the quality of existing pharyngeal residue severity rating scales based on FEES. Databases were searched using controlled vocabulary words and synonymous free text words for topics of interest (deglutition disorders, pharyngeal residue, endoscopy, videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic technology, aspiration, etc.) and outcomes of interest (scores, scales, grades, tests, FEES, etc.). Search strategies were adjusted for syntax appropriate for each database/platform. Data sources included MEDLINE (OvidSP 1946-April Week 3 2015), Embase (OvidSP 1974-2015 April 20), Scopus (Elsevier), and the unindexed material in PubMed (NLM/NIH) were searched for relevant articles. Supplementary efforts to identify studies included checking reference lists of articles retrieved. Scales were compared using qualitative properties (sample size, severity definitions, number of raters, and raters' experience and training) and psychometric analyses (randomization, intra- and inter-rater reliability, and construct validity). Seven articles describing pharyngeal residue severity rating scales met inclusion criteria. Six of seven scales had insufficient data to support their use as evidenced by methodological weaknesses with both qualitative properties and psychometric analyses. There is a need for qualitative and psychometrically reliable, validated, and generalizable pharyngeal residue severity rating scales that are anatomically specific, image-based, and easily learned by both novice and experienced clinicians. Only the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale, an anatomically defined and image-based tool, met all qualitative and psychometric criteria necessary for a valid, reliable, and generalizable vallecula and pyriform sinus severity rating scale based on FEES.

摘要

在纤维内镜吞咽功能评估(FEES)过程中,识别位于会厌谷和梨状窦的咽部残留严重程度一直是主要目标。咽部残留是潜在进食性误吸的临床征象,准确描述其严重程度是一项重要但具有挑战性的难题。一个可靠、经过验证且可推广的FEES咽部残留严重程度评分量表将大有裨益。对自1995年以来发表的英文文献进行了系统综述,以确定基于FEES的现有咽部残留严重程度评分量表的质量。使用感兴趣主题(吞咽障碍、咽部残留、内镜检查、视频荧光透视、纤维光学技术、误吸等)的控制词汇和同义自由文本词以及感兴趣的结果(评分、量表、分级、测试、FEES等)对数据库进行搜索。根据每个数据库/平台的语法对搜索策略进行调整。数据来源包括MEDLINE(OvidSP 1946 - 2015年4月第3周)、Embase(OvidSP 1974 - 2015年4月20日)、Scopus(爱思唯尔),并在PubMed(NLM/NIH)中搜索未索引的材料以查找相关文章。识别研究的补充工作包括检查检索到的文章的参考文献列表。使用定性属性(样本量、严重程度定义、评分者数量以及评分者的经验和培训)和心理测量分析(随机化、评分者内和评分者间信度以及结构效度)对量表进行比较。七篇描述咽部残留严重程度评分量表的文章符合纳入标准。七篇量表中有六篇数据不足,无法支持其使用,定性属性和心理测量分析方面的方法学弱点证明了这一点。需要定性和心理测量可靠、经过验证且可推广的咽部残留严重程度评分量表,这些量表应具有解剖学特异性、基于图像,并且新手和经验丰富的临床医生都易于学习。只有耶鲁咽部残留严重程度评分量表,一种基于解剖学定义且基于图像的工具,满足了基于FEES的有效、可靠且可推广的会厌谷和梨状窦严重程度评分量表所需的所有定性和心理测量标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验