Suppr超能文献

使用臭氧实现根龋的临床逆转:6个月的结果。

Clinical reversal of root caries using ozone: 6-month results.

作者信息

Baysan Aylin, Lynch Edward

机构信息

Department of Adult Oral Health, The Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Turner Street, London, UK.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2007 Aug;20(4):203-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of ozone either with or without a root sealant, for the management of leathery root caries.

METHODS

79 subjects with 220 root caries lesions were recruited into four study groups in this randomized, controlled trial. At baseline and after 1, 3, and 6 months, the ECM III and DIAGNOdent were employed. Subsequently, the root caries lesions were clinically assessed for color, hardness, cavitation, dimensions, distance from the gingival margin, and severity index. Modified USPHS criteria were also performed after 1, 3, and 6 months. These groups were as follows: Group 1: Ozone application was performed for a period of 10 seconds on caries lesions; Group 2: There was neither ozone nor root sealant application on root caries; Group 3: Ozone treatment and a root sealant were applied to root caries lesions; and Group 4: Only root sealant was applied to root caries.

RESULTS

At the 6-month recall, 78 subjects were examined. There were no observed adverse events. 38.1% of lesions became hard in the ozone only group, while none of the lesions became hard in the control group (P< 0.001). Noncavitated lesions were more likely to reverse than cavitated lesions. 38.4% of noncavitated lesions became hard, while only 5.7% of cavitated lesions became hard in the ozone only group. Modified USPHS criteria revealed that there were 66.6% intact sealants in the ozone and sealant group and 45.5% intact sealants in the sealant only group (P< 0.05). After 1, 3, and 6 months, the ECM and DIAGNOdent readings showed improvements in the ozone only group when compared to the control group (P< 0.001). The ozone and sealant group also had greater improvements in the ECM and DIAGNOdent values when compared to the sealant only group (P< 0.05).

摘要

目的

评估使用或不使用根管封闭剂的臭氧疗法治疗根面龋的安全性和有效性。

方法

在这项随机对照试验中,79名患有220处根面龋损的受试者被纳入四个研究组。在基线以及1、3和6个月后,使用ECM III和DIAGNOdent。随后,对根面龋损进行临床评估,包括颜色、硬度、龋洞形成、尺寸、距牙龈边缘的距离和严重程度指数。在1、3和6个月后还采用了改良的美国公共卫生署(USPHS)标准。这些组如下:第1组:对龋损进行10秒的臭氧处理;第2组:对根面龋既不进行臭氧处理也不使用根管封闭剂;第3组:对根面龋损进行臭氧处理并使用根管封闭剂;第4组:仅对根面龋使用根管封闭剂。

结果

在6个月的回访中,检查了78名受试者。未观察到不良事件。仅使用臭氧组中38.1%的龋损变硬,而对照组中无一例龋损变硬(P<0.001)。非龋洞性龋损比龋洞性龋损更有可能逆转。仅使用臭氧组中38.4%的非龋洞性龋损变硬,而龋洞性龋损仅有5.7%变硬。改良的USPHS标准显示,臭氧与封闭剂组中有66.6%的封闭剂完好,仅使用封闭剂组中有45.5%的封闭剂完好(P<0.05)。在1、3和6个月后,与对照组相比,仅使用臭氧组的ECM和DIAGNOdent读数显示有改善(P<0.001)。与仅使用封闭剂组相比,臭氧与封闭剂组在ECM和DIAGNOdent值方面也有更大改善(P<0.05)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验