Petersson Lars G, Hakestam Ulf, Baigi Amir, Lynch Edward
Department of Communty and Preventive Dentistry, Dental and Maxillofacial Unit, Central Hospital, Halmstad, S-301 85, Sweden.
Am J Dent. 2007 Apr;20(2):93-6.
To assess the clinical effect of daily use of a toothpaste and mouthrinse, both containing amine fluoride, on primary root caries lesions (PRCL) in an adult caries risk population.
A clinical trial based on male and female subjects, 55-81 years of age, randomly assigned into two equal groups (Groups A and B). Fifty subjects allocated to Group A used a fluoride toothpaste twice a day, (Elmex sensitive toothpaste, 1400 ppm F) plus a mouthrinse twice a day with 10 ml of a fluoride solution (Elmex sensitive rinse containing 250 ppm F). The fluoride used was amine fluoride and potassium fluoride (AmF/KF, 1:1). Subjects in Group B used the same fluoride toothpaste plus a placebo mouth rinse solution without fluoride. At baseline, a total of 420 PRCL were clinically recorded as either soft (score 3) or leathery (score 2). Parallel and blind recordings measuring electric resistance of the selected PRCL were performed at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months using an electrical caries monitor (ECM). Prevalence of tooth sensitivity and subject's satisfaction was also measured in the two groups.
The clinical results showed statistically significant higher numbers of reversals of soft (score 3) and leathery (score 2) PRCL in Group A compared to Group B. After 12 months, the number of soft PRCL (score 3) decreased in Group A from 74% at baseline to 11% compared with 73% to 46% in Group B. After 12 months, 67% of the PRCL became hard (score 1) in Group A compared to only 7% in Group B (P < 0.001). Statistically significant higher (P < 0.001) ECM mean (sd) log10 resistance values were recorded for the subjects in Group A, 2.67 (2.56) kOhm compared to 2.12 (1.88) kOhm in Group B. Tooth sensitivity was substantially reduced after 12 months, by 56% in Group A compared to 20% in Group B.
评估每日使用均含胺氟的牙膏和漱口水对成年龋病风险人群原发性根龋损害(PRCL)的临床效果。
一项基于55至81岁男性和女性受试者的临床试验,将其随机分为两组(A组和B组),每组人数相等。分配到A组的50名受试者每天使用两次含氟牙膏(艾美适敏感牙膏,含氟量1400 ppm),并每天两次使用10毫升含氟溶液进行漱口(艾美适敏感漱口水,含氟量250 ppm)。所使用的氟化物为胺氟和氟化钾(AmF/KF,1:1)。B组受试者使用相同的含氟牙膏加不含氟的安慰剂漱口水。基线时,共420处PRCL被临床记录为软质(评分为3)或坚韧(评分为2)。在基线以及3、6、9和12个月后,使用电子龋病监测仪(ECM)对选定的PRCL进行平行和盲法电阻测量。还对两组的牙齿敏感患病率和受试者满意度进行了测量。
临床结果显示,与B组相比,A组软质(评分为3)和坚韧(评分为2)PRCL的逆转数量在统计学上显著更高。12个月后,A组软质PRCL(评分为3)的数量从基线时的74%降至11%,而B组则从73%降至46%。12个月后,A组67%的PRCL变为硬质(评分为1),而B组仅为7%(P < 0.001)。A组受试者的ECM平均(标准差)log10电阻值在统计学上显著更高(P < 0.001),为2.67(2.56)kΩ,而B组为2.12(1.88)kΩ。12个月后牙齿敏感度大幅降低,A组降低了56%,而B组降低了20%。