Cohen Noaz, Weiser Mark, Reichenberg Abraham, Davis John M, Davidson Michael, Werbeloff Nomi
The Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Drora and Pinchas Zachai Division of Psychiatry, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Jun 2;41:100371. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100371. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Cognitive impairment, a core feature of schizophrenia, is often evident before the onset of illness. The current study aimed to quantify IQ decline following the onset of illness by conducting a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies that evaluated cognitive functioning both before and after the first psychotic episode. Consistency in measurement tools - i.e. whether the same measurement tool was used at both assessments - was considered a potential moderating variable.
Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis - seven using the same measurement tool at both time-points and four using different tools. In addition, meta-regression explored whether the magnitude of IQ decline was associated with age at baseline.
The meta-analysis effect size was -0.343 (95 % CI: -0.503 to -0.184), equivalent to a decrease of 5 IQ points. Use of the same (SMD -0.321, 95 % CI: -0.501 to -0.142) vs different (SMD -0.427, 95 % CI: -0.777 to -0.077) measurement tools was not a moderator of IQ change ( = 0.279). The meta-regression results were not significant ( = 0.544).
The current meta-analysis indicates a slight cognitive decline from the premorbid stage to post-onset. The use of different measurement tools yielded a slightly larger effect size and greater heterogeneity, suggesting that employing the same assessment tool could lead to more accurate results. Future longitudinal studies should focus on determining the timeline of cognitive decline.
认知障碍是精神分裂症的核心特征,常在发病前就已明显。本研究旨在通过对纵向研究进行荟萃分析来量化发病后的智商下降情况,这些纵向研究在首次精神病发作前后均评估了认知功能。测量工具的一致性,即两次评估是否使用相同的测量工具,被视为一个潜在的调节变量。
11项研究纳入了荟萃分析,其中7项在两个时间点使用相同的测量工具,4项使用不同的工具。此外,荟萃回归探讨了智商下降幅度是否与基线年龄相关。
荟萃分析效应量为-0.343(95%可信区间:-0.503至-0.184),相当于智商下降5分。使用相同(标准化均值差-0.321,95%可信区间:-0.501至-0.142)与不同(标准化均值差-0.427,95%可信区间:-0.777至-0.077)测量工具并非智商变化的调节因素(P = 0.279)。荟萃回归结果不显著(P = 0.544)。
当前的荟萃分析表明,从病前阶段到发病后存在轻微的认知下降。使用不同的测量工具产生的效应量略大且异质性更大,这表明使用相同的评估工具可能会得出更准确的结果。未来的纵向研究应侧重于确定认知下降的时间线。