• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急慢性腰痛的药物治疗:美国疼痛学会/美国医师学会临床实践指南的证据综述

Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.

作者信息

Chou Roger, Huffman Laurie Hoyt

机构信息

Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):505-14. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008
PMID:17909211
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medications are the most frequently prescribed therapy for low back pain. A challenge in choosing pharmacologic therapy is that each class of medication is associated with a unique balance of risks and benefits.

PURPOSE

To assess benefits and harms of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antiepileptic drugs, skeletal muscle relaxants, opioid analgesics, tramadol, and systemic corticosteroids for acute or chronic low back pain (with or without leg pain).

DATA SOURCES

English-language studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE (through November 2006) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2006, Issue 4). These electronic searches were supplemented by hand searching reference lists and additional citations suggested by experts.

STUDY SELECTION

Systematic reviews and randomized trials of dual therapy or monotherapy with 1 or more of the preceding medications for acute or chronic low back pain that reported pain outcomes, back-specific function, general health status, work disability, or patient satisfaction.

DATA EXTRACTION

We abstracted information about study design, population characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events. To grade methodological quality, we used the Oxman criteria for systematic reviews and the Cochrane Back Review Group criteria for individual trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We found good evidence that NSAIDs, acetaminophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain) are effective for pain relief. The magnitude of benefit was moderate (effect size of 0.5 to 0.8, improvement of 10 to 20 points on a 100-point visual analogue pain scale, or relative risk of 1.25 to 2.00 for the proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant pain relief), except in the case of tricyclic antidepressants (for which the benefit was small to moderate). We also found fair evidence that opioids, tramadol, benzodiazepines, and gabapentin (for radiculopathy) are effective for pain relief. We found good evidence that systemic corticosteroids are ineffective. Adverse events, such as sedation, varied by medication, although reliable data on serious and long-term harms are sparse. Most trials were short term (< or =4 weeks). Few data address efficacy of dual-medication therapy compared with monotherapy, or beneficial effects on functional outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

Our primary source of data was systematic reviews. We included non-English-language trials only if they were included in English-language systematic reviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Medications with good evidence of short-term effectiveness for low back pain are NSAIDs, acetaminophen, skeletal muscle relaxants (for acute low back pain), and tricyclic antidepressants (for chronic low back pain). Evidence is insufficient to identify one medication as offering a clear overall net advantage because of complex tradeoffs between benefits and harms. Individual patients are likely to differ in how they weigh potential benefits, harms, and costs of various medications.

摘要

背景

药物是治疗腰痛最常用的疗法。选择药物治疗面临的一个挑战是,每类药物的风险和益处都有独特的平衡。

目的

评估对乙酰氨基酚、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、抗抑郁药、苯二氮䓬类药物、抗癫痫药、骨骼肌松弛剂、阿片类镇痛药、曲马多和全身性皮质类固醇对急性或慢性腰痛(伴或不伴腿痛)的益处和危害。

数据来源

通过检索MEDLINE(截至2006年11月)和Cochrane系统评价数据库(2006年第4期)确定英文研究。这些电子检索通过手工检索参考文献列表以及专家推荐的其他引文进行补充。

研究选择

对上述一种或多种药物进行双药治疗或单药治疗急性或慢性腰痛的系统评价和随机试验,这些试验报告了疼痛结局、腰部特定功能、总体健康状况、工作残疾或患者满意度。

数据提取

我们提取了有关研究设计、人群特征、干预措施、结局和不良事件的信息。为了评估方法学质量,我们使用了系统评价的奥克斯曼标准和单个试验的Cochrane腰痛评价组标准。

数据综合

我们发现充分证据表明,NSAIDs、对乙酰氨基酚、骨骼肌松弛剂(用于急性腰痛)和三环类抗抑郁药(用于慢性腰痛)对缓解疼痛有效。益处程度为中等(效应大小为0.5至0.8,在100分视觉模拟疼痛量表上改善10至20分,或经历临床显著疼痛缓解的患者比例的相对风险为1.25至2.00),三环类抗抑郁药的情况除外(其益处为小至中等)。我们还发现合理证据表明,阿片类药物、曲马多、苯二氮䓬类药物和加巴喷丁(用于神经根病)对缓解疼痛有效。我们发现充分证据表明全身性皮质类固醇无效。尽管关于严重和长期危害的可靠数据稀少,但镇静等不良事件因药物而异。大多数试验为短期(≤4周)。很少有数据涉及双药治疗与单药治疗相比的疗效,或对功能结局的有益影响。

局限性

我们的主要数据来源是系统评价。仅当非英文试验被纳入英文系统评价时,我们才将其纳入。

结论

有充分证据表明对腰痛短期有效的药物是NSAIDs、对乙酰氨基酚、骨骼肌松弛剂(用于急性腰痛)和三环类抗抑郁药(用于慢性腰痛)。由于益处和危害之间存在复杂的权衡,证据不足以确定一种药物具有明显的总体净优势。不同患者对各种药物潜在益处、危害和成本的权衡方式可能不同。

相似文献

1
Medications for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.急慢性腰痛的药物治疗:美国疼痛学会/美国医师学会临床实践指南的证据综述
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):505-14. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008.
2
Systemic Pharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.系统药理学治疗腰痛:美国医师学院临床实践指南的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):480-492. doi: 10.7326/M16-2458. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.急性和慢性下腰痛的非药物治疗:美国疼痛学会/美国医师学会临床实践指南的证据综述
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007.
4
Pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.成人腰痛的药物治疗:Cochrane 综述概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 4;4(4):CD013815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013815.pub2.
5
Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain.系统评价指南推荐用于治疗腰痛的药物。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 May 13;30(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00435-3.
6
7
Drug therapy for back pain. Which drugs help which patients?背痛的药物治疗。哪些药物对哪些患者有帮助?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 15;21(24):2840-9; discussion 2849-50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00007.
8
Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis.坐骨神经痛患者缓解疼痛的药物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2012 Feb 13;344:e497. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e497.
9
Pharmacologic management of chronic low back pain: synthesis of the evidence.慢性下背痛的药物治疗管理:证据综合。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S131-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822f178f.
10
Medications for Treating Low Back Pain in Adults. Evidence for the Use of Paracetamol, Opioids, Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatories, Muscle Relaxants, Antibiotics, and Antidepressants: An Overview for Musculoskeletal Clinicians.成人腰痛治疗药物。对乙酰氨基酚、阿片类药物、非甾体抗炎药、肌肉松弛剂、抗生素和抗抑郁药的使用证据:肌肉骨骼临床医生概述。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jul;52(7):425-431. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10788. Epub 2022 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Electroacupuncture for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy: Rationale and Study Protocol.一项关于电针治疗腰椎间盘突出症伴神经根病疗效和安全性的随机、假对照试验:原理与研究方案
J Pain Res. 2025 May 5;18:2307-2319. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S512711. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of Traditional Chinese Exercise Yijinjing on Disability and Muscle Strength Among Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.传统中医功法易筋经对慢性下腰痛患者残疾状况和肌肉力量的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 7;14:e67557. doi: 10.2196/67557.
3
Trends in Drug Claims for Non-Specific Low Back Pain in Québec, 1997 to 2018.
1997年至2018年魁北克非特异性下背痛药物索赔趋势
Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70084. doi: 10.1002/msc.70084.
4
Chronic lower back pain among occupational workers: effect of relaxation technique on quality of working life, pain and disability level with nurse-led intervention.职业劳动者的慢性下背痛:护士主导干预下放松技巧对工作生活质量、疼痛及残疾程度的影响
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 3;24(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02753-2.
5
Response to functional restoration in non-specific chronic low back pain with Modic type 1 changes.伴有Modic 1型改变的非特异性慢性下腰痛对功能恢复的反应
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):1095-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08665-8. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
6
Comparison of Mesotherapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.中胚层疗法与经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的比较:一项随机临床试验
Tunis Med. 2025 Jan 5;103(1):73-79. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v103i1.5187.
7
Neuromodulation in chronic pain management: addressing persistent doubts in spinal cord stimulation.慢性疼痛管理中的神经调节:解决脊髓刺激方面的持续疑问。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Jan 6;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00219-6.
8
Immediate Efficacy of Contralateral Acupuncture on SI3 Combined with Active Exercise for Acute Lumbar Sprains: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.对侧针刺配合主动运动治疗急性腰扭伤的即刻疗效:一项随机对照试验方案
J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 13;17:2099-2110. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S475839. eCollection 2024.
9
Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison.近期腰痛管理的临床实践指南:全球比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 1;25(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07468-0.
10
Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in low back pain.腰椎间盘退变与下腰痛。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Apr;90(4):330-338. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17843-1.