Manchukonda Rajeev, Manchikanti Kavita N, Cash Kimberly A, Pampati Vidyasagar, Manchikanti Laxmaiah
Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY 42003, USA.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Oct;20(7):539-45. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180577812.
A retrospective review.
Evaluation of the prevalence of facet or zygapophysial joint pain in chronic spinal pain of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar origin by using controlled, comparative local anesthetic blocks and evaluation of false-positive rates of single blocks in the diagnosis of chronic spinal pain of facet joint origin.
Facet or zygapophysial joints are clinically important sources of chronic cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine pain. The previous studies have demonstrated the value and validity of controlled, comparative local anesthetic blocks in the diagnosis of facet joint pain, with a prevalence of 15% to 67% variable in lumbar, thoracic, and cervical regions. False-positive rates of single diagnostic blocks also varied from 17% to 63%.
Five hundred consecutive patients receiving controlled, comparative local anesthetic blocks of medial branches for the diagnosis of facet or zygapophysial joint pain were included. Patients were investigated with diagnostic blocks using 0.5 mL of 1% lidocaine per nerve. Patients with lidocaine-positive results were further studied using 0.5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per nerve on a separate occasion. Medial branch blocks were performed with intermittent fluoroscopic visualization, at 2 levels to block a single joint. A positive response was considered as one with at least 80% pain relief from a block of at least 2 hours duration when lidocaine was used, and at least 3 hours or longer than the duration of relief with lidocaine when bupivacaine was used, and also the ability to perform prior painful movements.
A total of 438 patients met inclusion criteria. The prevalence of facet joint pain was 39% in the cervical spine [95% confidence interval (CI), 32%-45%]; 34% (95% CI, 22%-47%) in the thoracic pain; and 27% (95% CI, 22%-33%) in the lumbar spine. The false-positive rate with a single block in the cervical region was 45%, in the thoracic region was 42%, and in the lumbar region 45%.
This retrospective review once again confirmed the significant prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain.
回顾性研究。
通过使用对照、比较性局部麻醉阻滞来评估颈椎、胸椎和腰椎慢性脊柱疼痛中关节突或关节突关节疼痛的患病率,并评估单次阻滞在诊断关节突关节源性慢性脊柱疼痛中的假阳性率。
关节突或关节突关节是慢性颈椎、胸椎和腰椎疼痛的重要临床来源。先前的研究已经证明了对照、比较性局部麻醉阻滞在诊断关节突关节疼痛中的价值和有效性,腰椎、胸椎和颈椎区域的患病率在15%至67%之间变化。单次诊断性阻滞的假阳性率也在17%至63%之间。
纳入500例连续接受对照、比较性内侧支局部麻醉阻滞以诊断关节突或关节突关节疼痛的患者。使用每根神经0.5 mL 1%利多卡因进行诊断性阻滞对患者进行研究。利多卡因结果呈阳性的患者在另一个时间点使用每根神经0.5 mL 0.25%布比卡因进一步研究。内侧支阻滞在间歇性荧光透视下进行,在两个水平阻滞单个关节。当使用利多卡因时,阳性反应被认为是在至少2小时的阻滞中疼痛缓解至少80%,当使用布比卡因时,阳性反应被认为是在至少3小时或比利多卡因缓解持续时间更长的时间内疼痛缓解,并且还包括能够进行先前的疼痛动作。
共有438例患者符合纳入标准。颈椎关节突关节疼痛的患病率为39%[95%置信区间(CI),32%-45%];胸椎疼痛为34%(95%CI,22%-47%);腰椎为27%(95%CI,22%-33%)。颈椎区域单次阻滞的假阳性率为45%,胸椎区域为42%,腰椎区域为45%。
这项回顾性研究再次证实了关节突关节疼痛在慢性脊柱疼痛中具有显著的患病率。