Alanay Ahmet, Pekmezci Murat, Karaeminogullari Oguz, Acaroglu Emre, Yazici Muharrem, Cil Akin, Pijnenburg Bas, Genç Yasemin, Oner Fethullah C
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Dec;16(12):2126-32. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0474-z. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
Cobb method has been shown to be the most reliable technique with a reasonable measurement error to determine the kyphosis in fresh fractures of young patients. However, measurement errors may be higher for elderly patients as it may be difficult to determine the landmarks due to osteopenia and the degenerative changes. The aim of this study is to investigate the intrinsic error for different techniques used in evaluation of local sagittal plane deformity caused by OVCF. Lateral X-rays of OVCF patients were randomly selected. Patient group was composed of 28 females and 7 males and the mean age was 62.7 (55-75) years. The kyphosis angle and the vertebral body height were analyzed to reveal the severity of sagittal plane deformity. Kyphotic deformity was measured by using four different techniques; and the vertebral body heights (VBH) were measured at three different points. The mean intra-observer agreement interval for kyphosis angle measurement techniques ranged from +/-7.1 to +/-9.3 degrees while it ranged from +/-4.5 to +/-6.5 mm for VBH measurement techniques. The mean interobserver agreement interval for kyphosis angle ranged from +/-8.2 to +/-11.1 degrees , while it was between +/-4.5 to +/-6.5 mm for vertebral body height measurement techniques. This study revealed that although the intra and interobserver agreement were similar for all techniques, they are still higher than expected. These high intervals for measurement errors should be taken into account when interpreting the results of correction in local sagittal plane deformities of OVCF patients after surgical procedures such as vertebral augmentation techniques.
科布法已被证明是确定年轻患者新鲜骨折后后凸畸形最可靠的技术,测量误差合理。然而,老年患者的测量误差可能更高,因为由于骨质减少和退行性变,可能难以确定标志点。本研究的目的是调查用于评估骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)引起的局部矢状面畸形的不同技术的内在误差。随机选择OVCF患者的侧位X线片。患者组由28名女性和7名男性组成,平均年龄为62.7(55 - 75)岁。分析后凸角和椎体高度以揭示矢状面畸形的严重程度。使用四种不同技术测量后凸畸形;并在三个不同点测量椎体高度(VBH)。后凸角测量技术的观察者内平均一致性区间为±7.1至±9.3度,而VBH测量技术的区间为±4.5至±6.5毫米。后凸角的观察者间平均一致性区间为±8.2至±11.1度,而椎体高度测量技术的区间为±4.5至±6.5毫米。本研究表明,尽管所有技术的观察者内和观察者间一致性相似,但仍高于预期。在解释椎体强化技术等手术程序后OVCF患者局部矢状面畸形矫正结果时,应考虑这些较高的测量误差区间。