Pines Jesse M, Hollander Judd E
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
We study the impact of emergency department (ED) crowding on delays in treatment and nontreatment for patients with severe pain.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients presenting with severe pain to an inner-city, teaching ED during 17 months. Poor care was defined by 3 outcomes: not receiving treatment with pain medication while in the ED, a delay (>1 hour) from triage to first pain medication, and a delay (>1 hour) from room placement to first pain medication. Three validated crowding measures were assigned to each patient at triage. Logistic regression was used to test the association between crowding and outcomes.
In 13,758 patients with severe pain, the mean age was 39 years (SD 16 years), 73% were black, and 64% were female patients. Half (49%) of the patients received pain medication. Of those treated, 3,965 (59%) experienced delays in treatment from triage and 1,319 (20%) experienced delays from time of room placement. After controlling for factors associated with the ED treatment of pain (race, sex, severity, and older age), nontreatment was independently associated with waiting room number (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 for each additional waiting patient; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.03) and occupancy rate (OR 1.01 for each 10% increase in occupancy; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.04). Increasing waiting room number and occupancy rate also independently predicted delays in pain medication from triage (OR 1.05 for each waiting patient, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.06; OR 1.18 for each 10% increase in occupancy; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.21) and delay in pain medication from room placement (OR 1.02 for each waiting patient, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03; OR 1.06 for each 10% increase in occupancy, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.08).
ED crowding is associated with poor quality of care in patients with severe pain, with respect to total lack of treatment and delay until treatment.
我们研究急诊科拥挤对重度疼痛患者治疗延误和未治疗情况的影响。
我们对17个月内到市中心一家教学医院急诊科就诊的所有重度疼痛患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。不良护理由3项结果定义:在急诊科未接受止痛药物治疗、从分诊到首次使用止痛药物的延迟(>1小时)以及从安置病房到首次使用止痛药物的延迟(>1小时)。在分诊时为每位患者分配了3种经过验证的拥挤程度测量指标。采用逻辑回归分析来检验拥挤程度与结果之间的关联。
在13758例重度疼痛患者中,平均年龄为39岁(标准差16岁),73%为黑人,64%为女性患者。一半(49%)的患者接受了止痛药物治疗。在接受治疗的患者中,3965例(59%)从分诊开始经历了治疗延误,1319例(20%)从安置病房时开始经历了延误。在控制了与急诊科疼痛治疗相关的因素(种族、性别、严重程度和年龄较大)后,未治疗情况与候诊人数独立相关(每增加一名候诊患者,比值比[OR]为1.03;95%置信区间[CI]为1.02至1.03)以及占用率(占用率每增加10%,OR为1.01;95%CI为0.99至1.04)。候诊人数和占用率的增加也独立预测了从分诊开始的止痛药物延迟(每增加一名候诊患者,OR为1.05,95%CI为1.04至1.06;占用率每增加10%,OR为1.18;95%CI为1.15至1.21)以及从安置病房开始的止痛药物延迟(每增加一名候诊患者,OR为1.02,95%CI为1.01至1.03;占用率每增加10%),OR为)。
急诊科拥挤与重度疼痛患者的护理质量差相关,包括完全未接受治疗和治疗延迟。