• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测急诊科危急结局的基于人工智能的急诊分诊模型的开发与内部验证

Development and internal validation of an AI-based emergency triage model for predicting critical outcomes in emergency department.

作者信息

Sitthiprawiat Patipan, Wittayachamnankul Borwon, Sirikul Wachiranun, Laohavisudhi Korsin

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17180-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-17180-1
PMID:40854972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12378333/
Abstract

Emergency department (ED) overcrowding contributes to delayed patient care and worse clinical outcomes. Traditional triage systems face accuracy and consistency limitations. This study developed and internally validated a machine learning model predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and resource utilization in ED patients. A retrospective analysis of 163,452 ED visits (2018-2022) from Maharaj Nakhon Chiang Mai Hospital evaluated logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost models against the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). The XGBoost model achieved superior predictive performance (AUROC 0.917 vs. 0.882, AUPRC 0.629 vs. 0.333). Key predictors included mode of arrival, patient age, and free-text chief complaints analyzed with multilingual sentence embeddings. These results demonstrate that machine learning, incorporating unstructured text data, has the potential to enhance triage accuracy and resource allocation by more effectively identifying critically ill patients compared to traditional triage methods.

摘要

急诊科过度拥挤会导致患者护理延迟和临床结果恶化。传统的分诊系统存在准确性和一致性方面的局限性。本研究开发并内部验证了一种机器学习模型,用于预测急诊科患者的重症监护病房(ICU)收治情况和资源利用情况。对清迈玛哈那空医院163452次急诊科就诊(2018 - 2022年)进行回顾性分析,将逻辑回归、随机森林和XGBoost模型与加拿大分诊及 acuity 量表(CTAS)进行比较。XGBoost模型表现出卓越的预测性能(曲线下面积[AUROC]为0.917,而其他模型为0.882;精确率-召回率曲线下面积[AUPRC]为0.629,而其他模型为0.333)。关键预测因素包括到达方式、患者年龄以及通过多语言句子嵌入分析的自由文本主诉。这些结果表明,与传统分诊方法相比,纳入非结构化文本数据的机器学习有潜力通过更有效地识别重症患者来提高分诊准确性和资源分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/d162bed46a44/41598_2025_17180_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/a800c51f4439/41598_2025_17180_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/020e1d28212e/41598_2025_17180_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/304912fe5e14/41598_2025_17180_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/d162bed46a44/41598_2025_17180_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/a800c51f4439/41598_2025_17180_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/020e1d28212e/41598_2025_17180_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/304912fe5e14/41598_2025_17180_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70da/12378333/d162bed46a44/41598_2025_17180_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and internal validation of an AI-based emergency triage model for predicting critical outcomes in emergency department.用于预测急诊科危急结局的基于人工智能的急诊分诊模型的开发与内部验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17180-1.
2
Machine learning outperforms the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in predicting need for early critical care.在预测早期重症监护需求方面,机器学习的表现优于加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表(CTAS)。
CJEM. 2025 Jan;27(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00807-z. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
The role of AI in emergency department triage: An integrative systematic review.人工智能在急诊科分诊中的作用:一项综合系统评价。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Apr 29;89:104058. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104058.
4
Predicting Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level, hospital admission, and admitting ward in an emergency department using data-driven machine learning.使用数据驱动的机器学习预测急诊科的急诊严重程度指数(ESI)级别、住院情况及收治科室。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02941-9.
5
Using Traditional and Deep Machine Learning to Predict Emergency Room Triage Levels.使用传统机器学习和深度机器学习预测急诊室分诊级别。
J Comput Biol. 2025 Jun;32(6):584-600. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2024.0632. Epub 2025 May 22.
6
Machine Learning for Personalized Prediction of Electrocardiogram (EKG) Use in Emergency Care.用于急诊护理中心电图(EKG)个性化预测的机器学习
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 6;15(8):358. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080358.
7
Risk Factors for Hospital Admissions Among Emergency Department Patients: From Triage to Admission.急诊科患者住院的危险因素:从分诊到入院
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 25;26(3):513-522. doi: 10.5811/westjem.21263.
8
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
9
Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Chest Radiographs for Predicting Major Adverse Events in Patients Visiting the Emergency Department With Acute Cardiopulmonary Symptoms.用于预测急性心肺症状患者到急诊科就诊时主要不良事件的胸部X光片人工智能分析
Korean J Radiol. 2025 Sep;26(9):877-887. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2025.0237.
10
Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Development of Emergency Medical Rapid Triage Prediction Models in Acute Care.机器学习技术在急性护理中急诊医学快速分诊预测模型开发中的应用。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):35-43. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001057.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning outperforms the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in predicting need for early critical care.在预测早期重症监护需求方面,机器学习的表现优于加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表(CTAS)。
CJEM. 2025 Jan;27(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00807-z. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
2
Clinical prediction models and the multiverse of madness.临床预测模型与疯狂的多元宇宙。
BMC Med. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03212-y.
3
Trends by Acuity for Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Admissions in California, 2012 to 2022.
2012年至2022年加利福尼亚州急诊科就诊和住院情况的 acuity 趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48053.
4
Accuracy of Pain Scales in Predicting Critical Diagnoses in Non-Traumatic Abdominal Pain Cases; a Cross-sectional Study.疼痛量表在预测非创伤性腹痛病例关键诊断中的准确性;一项横断面研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 5;11(1):e68. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2131. eCollection 2023.
5
Cognitive biases regarding utilization of emergency severity index among emergency nurses.急诊护士在使用急诊严重程度指数方面的认知偏差。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Nov;73:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.08.021. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
6
Stability of clinical prediction models developed using statistical or machine learning methods.基于统计或机器学习方法开发的临床预测模型的稳定性。
Biom J. 2023 Dec;65(8):e2200302. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200302. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
7
Epic Sepsis Model Inpatient Predictive Analytic Tool: A Validation Study.重症脓毒症模型住院患者预测分析工具:一项验证研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Jun 30;5(7):e0941. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000941. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terminology (SNOMED CT) Clinical Use Cases in the Context of Electronic Health Record Systems: Systematic Literature Review.电子健康记录系统背景下的医学临床术语系统命名法(SNOMED CT)临床用例:系统文献综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Feb 6;11:e43750. doi: 10.2196/43750.
9
Overcrowding in Emergency Department: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions-A Narrative Review.急诊科过度拥挤:原因、后果及解决方案——一篇叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;10(9):1625. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091625.
10
Cognitive and implicit biases in nurses' judgment and decision-making: A scoping review.护士判断和决策中的认知和内隐偏见:范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Sep;133:104284. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104284. Epub 2022 May 24.