Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1339-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01082.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
As hospital crowding has increased, more patients have ended up boarding in the emergency department (ED) awaiting their inpatient beds. To the best of our knowledge, no study has compared the quality of care of boarded and nonboarded patients.
This study sought to examine whether being a boarded patient and boarding longer were associated with more delays, medication errors, and adverse events among ED patients admitted with chest pain, pneumonia, or cellulitis.
This study was a retrospective cohort design in which data collection was accomplished via medical record review from two urban teaching hospitals. Patients admitted with chest pain, pneumonia, or cellulitis between August 2004 and January 2005 were eligible for inclusion. Our outcomes measures were: 1) delays in administration of home medications, cardiac enzyme tests, partial thromboplastin time (PTT), and antibiotics; 2) medication errors; and 3) adverse events or near misses. Primary independent variables were boarded status, boarding time, and boarded time interval. Multiple logistic regression models controlling for patient, ED, and hospital characteristics were used.
A total of 1,431 patient charts were included: 811 with chest pain, 387 with pneumonia, and 233 with cellulitis. Boarding time was associated with an increased odds of home medication delays (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.10), as were boarded time intervals of 12, 18, and 24 hours. Boarding time also was associated with lower odds of having a late cardiac enzyme test (AOR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 to 0.97).
Boarding was associated with home medication delays, but fewer cardiac enzyme test delays. Boarding was not associated with delayed PTT checks, antibiotic administration, medication errors, or adverse events/near misses. These findings likely reflect the inherent resources of the ED and the inpatient units.
随着医院拥挤程度的增加,越来越多的患者最终在急诊部(ED)等待住院床位。据我们所知,尚无研究比较过留观患者和非留观患者的护理质量。
本研究旨在探讨胸痛、肺炎或蜂窝织炎患者入住 ED 时,作为留观患者和留观时间较长是否与更多的延迟、用药错误和不良事件相关。
这是一项回顾性队列设计研究,通过对两家城市教学医院的病历回顾进行数据收集。2004 年 8 月至 2005 年 1 月期间因胸痛、肺炎或蜂窝织炎入院的患者符合纳入标准。我们的结局指标为:1)家用药物、心脏酶检测、部分凝血活酶时间(PTT)和抗生素的给药延迟;2)用药错误;3)不良事件或接近错误。主要的独立变量为留观状态、留观时间和留观时间间隔。使用控制患者、ED 和医院特征的多变量逻辑回归模型。
共纳入 1431 份患者病历:811 份胸痛、387 份肺炎和 233 份蜂窝织炎。留观时间与家用药物延迟的可能性增加相关(调整后优势比[OR] = 1.07,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.05 至 1.10),12、18 和 24 小时的留观时间间隔也与留观时间相关。留观时间还与较晚的心脏酶检测的可能性降低相关(OR = 0.93,95% CI = 0.88 至 0.97)。
留观与家用药物延迟相关,但与心脏酶检测延迟较少相关。留观与 PTT 检查延迟、抗生素给药、用药错误或不良事件/接近错误无关。这些发现可能反映了 ED 和住院病房的固有资源。