Hulme P A, Boyd S K, Ferguson S J
MEM Research Center, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, CH 3014, Bern, Switzerland.
Bone. 2007 Dec;41(6):946-57. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.019. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
Vertebral fractures may result in pain, loss of height, spinal instability, kyphotic deformity and ultimately increased morbidity. Fracture risk can be estimated by vertebral bone mineral density (BMD). However, vertebral fractures may be better defined by more selective methods that account for micro-architecture. Our aim was to quantify regional variations in bone architecture parameters (BAPs) and to assess the degree with which regional variations in BAPs affect vertebral fracture strength. The influence of disc health and endplate thickness on fracture strength was also determined. The soft tissue and posterior elements of 20 human functional spine units (FSU) were removed (T9 to L5, mean 74.45+/-4.25 years). After micro-CT scanning of the entire FSU, the strength of the specimens was determined using a materials testing system. Specimens were loaded in compression to failure. BAPs were assessed for 10 regions of the vertebral cancellous bone. Disc health (glycosaminoglycan content of the nucleus pulposus) was determined using the degree of binding with Alcian Blue. Vertebrae were not morphologically homogeneous. Posterior regions of the vertebrae had greater bone volume, more connections, reduced trabecular separation and more plate-like isotropic structures than their corresponding anterior regions. Significant heterogeneity also exists between posterior superior and inferior regions (BV/TV: posterior superior 12.6+/-2.8%, inferior 14.6+/-3%; anterior superior 10.5+/-2.2%, inferior 10.7+/-2.4%). Of the two endplates that abutted a common disc, the cranial inferior endplate was thicker (0.44+/-0.15 mm) than the caudal superior endplate (0.37+/-0.13 mm). Our study found good correlations between BV/TV, connective density and yield strength. Fracture risk prediction, using BV/TV multiplied by the cross sectional area of the endplate, can be improved through regional analysis of the underlying cancellous bone of the endplate of interest (R(2) 0.78) rather than analysis of the entire vertebra (R(2) 0.65) or BMD (R(2) 0.47). Degenerated discs lack a defined nucleus. A negative linear relationship between disc health and vertebral strength (R(2) 0.70) was observed, likely due to a shift in loading from the weaker anterior vertebral region to the stronger posterior region and cortical shell. Our results show the importance of considering regional variations in cancellous BAPs and disc health when assessing fracture risk.
椎体骨折可能导致疼痛、身高降低、脊柱不稳定、后凸畸形,最终增加发病率。骨折风险可通过椎体骨密度(BMD)进行评估。然而,通过考虑微观结构的更具选择性的方法可能能更好地定义椎体骨折。我们的目的是量化骨结构参数(BAPs)的区域差异,并评估BAPs的区域差异对椎体骨折强度的影响程度。还确定了椎间盘健康状况和终板厚度对骨折强度的影响。去除了20个人类功能性脊柱单元(FSU)(T9至L5,平均年龄74.45±4.25岁)的软组织和后部结构。在对整个FSU进行显微CT扫描后,使用材料测试系统确定标本的强度。对标本进行压缩加载直至破坏。对椎体松质骨的10个区域评估BAPs。使用与阿尔新蓝的结合程度来确定椎间盘健康状况(髓核的糖胺聚糖含量)。椎体在形态上并非均匀一致。椎体的后部区域比其相应的前部区域具有更大的骨体积、更多的连接、更小的小梁间距以及更多的板状各向同性结构。后上区域和后下区域之间也存在显著的异质性(骨体积分数:后上12.6±2.8%,后下14.6±3%;前上10.5±2.2%,前下10.7±2.4%)。与同一个椎间盘相邻的两个终板中,颅侧下终板(0.44±0.15毫米)比尾侧上终板(0.37±0.13毫米)更厚。我们的研究发现骨体积分数、连接密度和屈服强度之间存在良好的相关性。通过对感兴趣终板下方的松质骨进行区域分析(R² 0.78),而不是对整个椎体(R² 0.65)或骨密度(R² 0.47)进行分析,使用骨体积分数乘以终板横截面积来预测骨折风险可以得到改善。退变的椎间盘缺乏明确的髓核。观察到椎间盘健康状况与椎体强度之间存在负线性关系(R² 0.70),这可能是由于载荷从较弱的椎体前部区域转移到了较强的后部区域和皮质壳。我们的结果表明,在评估骨折风险时考虑松质骨BAPs的区域差异和椎间盘健康状况的重要性。