Connolly Patricia A, Durkin Michelle M, Lemonte Ann M, Hackett Emily J, Wheat L Joseph
MiraVista Diagnostics, 4444 Decatur Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46241, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007 Dec;14(12):1587-91. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00071-07. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
The second-generation Histoplasma antigen immunoassay is semiquantitative, expressing results as a comparison to a negative control, which requires repeat testing of the prior specimen with the current specimen to accurately determine a change in antigen. Reporting results in this manner often is confusing to the ordering physician and laboratory. Development of a quantitative assay could improve accuracy, reduce interassay variability, and eliminate the need to test the prior sample with the current sample in the same assay. Calibrators with known concentrations of Histoplasma antigen were used to quantitate antigen in specimens from patients with histoplasmosis and from controls. Samples from cases of disseminated histoplasmosis or other mycoses and controls were tested to evaluate the performance characteristics of the quantitative assay. Paired specimens were evaluated to determine if quantitation eliminated the need to test the current and prior specimens in the same assay to assess a change in antigen. The sensitivity in samples from patients with AIDS and disseminated histoplasmosis was 100% in urine and 92.3% in serum. Cross-reactions occurred in 70% of other endemic mycoses, but not in aspergillosis. Specificity was 99% in controls with community-acquired pneumonia, medical conditions in which histoplasmosis was excluded, or healthy subjects. A change in antigen level categorized as an increase, no change, or decrease based on antigen units determined in the same assay agreed closely with the category of change in nanograms/milliliter determined from testing current and prior specimens in different assays. Sensitivity, specificity, and interassay precision are excellent in the new third-generation quantitative Histoplasma antigen immunoassay.
第二代组织胞浆菌抗原免疫测定是半定量的,将结果表示为与阴性对照的比较,这需要用当前标本对先前标本进行重复检测,以准确确定抗原的变化。以这种方式报告结果常常令开单医生和实验室感到困惑。开发一种定量测定方法可以提高准确性、减少测定间的变异性,并消除在同一测定中用当前标本检测先前标本的需要。使用已知浓度的组织胞浆菌抗原校准品对组织胞浆菌病患者和对照的标本中的抗原进行定量。对播散性组织胞浆菌病或其他真菌病病例及对照的样本进行检测,以评估定量测定的性能特征。对配对标本进行评估,以确定定量是否消除了在同一测定中检测当前和先前标本以评估抗原变化的需要。艾滋病合并播散性组织胞浆菌病患者样本的尿液敏感性为100%,血清敏感性为92.3%。70%的其他地方性真菌病出现交叉反应,但曲霉病未出现交叉反应。在社区获得性肺炎、排除组织胞浆菌病的疾病状况或健康对照中,特异性为99%。根据同一测定中确定的抗原单位将抗原水平变化分类为增加、无变化或减少,与在不同测定中检测当前和先前标本所确定的纳克/毫升变化类别密切一致。在新的第三代定量组织胞浆菌抗原免疫测定中,敏感性、特异性和测定间精密度都非常好。