在正常人群、高眼压人群和青光眼人群中，将动态轮廓眼压测量法与戈德曼眼压测量法和手持眼压测量法进行比较。

Comparing dynamic contour tonometry to Goldmann and hand-held tonometry in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations.

作者信息

Eichenbaum Kenneth D, Mezej Mihaly, Eichenbaum Joseph W

机构信息

Department of Structural and Chemical Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1050 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10028, USA.

出版信息

Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie). 2007 Spring;39(1):41-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02697325.

DOI:10.1007/BF02697325

PMID:17914204

Abstract

We prospectively compared dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) to Goldmann (GAT) and hand-held tonometry (HHT) in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations. Both measurements were made on each patient within a 5-minute period during routine office exams over 4 months. While DCT is in good overall agreement with GAT and HTT, there is some systematic deviation at different pressure ranges in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations.

摘要

我们在正常人群、高眼压人群和青光眼人群中对动态轮廓眼压计（DCT）与戈德曼眼压计（GAT）和手持眼压计（HHT）进行了前瞻性比较。在4个月的常规门诊检查期间，在5分钟内对每位患者进行了两种测量。虽然DCT与GAT和HTT总体上一致性良好，但在正常人群、高眼压人群和青光眼人群的不同压力范围内存在一些系统偏差。