Suppr超能文献

使用新型鞘状软性膀胱镜评估操作效率:一项随机对照试验

Evaluation of practice efficiency with a novel sheathed flexible cystoscope: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Krebs Alfred, Borin James F, Kim Isaac Y, Jackson Donna J, McDougall Elspeth M, Clayman Ralph V

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, California 92868, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):883-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1112. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The processing of standard flexible cystoscopes is time-consuming and potentially hazardous to healthcare staff. We evaluated a novel flexible cystoscope system containing a disposable sheath, which obviates the need for chemical processing.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients undergoing office cystoscopy were randomized into a "sheath" or a control group (n = 50 for each group). Disposable Slide-On sheaths and the CST-2000 Flexible Cystoscope System were used in the former group. A standard 16F flexible cystoscope, manually cleaned and disinfected with Cidex OPA or Rapicide, was used in the control group and the preparation times were recorded. Questionnaires to assess cystoscope setup, handling, optical quality, and patient comfort were completed by the physician, nursing staff, and patients.

RESULTS

Data were available for 97 patients. The mean total time required for preparation of the cystoscopes was 10.7, 14.7, and 42.2 minutes for the sheath (n = 49), Rapicide (n = 21), and Cidex OPA (n = 27), respectively (P <0.01 for all comparisons). The control group scored better than the sheath group with regard to ease of cystoscope insertion (9.1 versus 7.7), cystoscope handling (8.8 versus 8.1), and irrigation setup (8.8 versus 8.2; all P < or = 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found between groups for procedure time, optical quality, or patient comfort, either during or after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The EndoSheath System can save 4 to 31 minutes of processing time while avoiding exposure to irritants found in conventional soaking methods. Although maneuvering of the sheathed cystoscope was slightly more difficult, the optical quality and patient comfort were similar to those of standard flexible cystoscopy.

摘要

目的

标准软性膀胱镜的处理耗时且对医护人员有潜在危害。我们评估了一种新型软性膀胱镜系统,其包含一次性鞘管,无需化学处理。

方法

总共100例行门诊膀胱镜检查的患者被随机分为“鞘管”组或对照组(每组n = 50)。前一组使用一次性滑动式鞘管和CST - 2000软性膀胱镜系统。对照组使用标准的16F软性膀胱镜,用戊二醛癸甲溴铵或复合过氧乙酸手动清洁和消毒,并记录准备时间。医生、护理人员和患者完成了评估膀胱镜设置、操作、光学质量和患者舒适度的问卷。

结果

97例患者的数据可用。鞘管组(n = 49)、复合过氧乙酸组(n = 21)和戊二醛癸甲溴铵组(n = 27)准备膀胱镜所需的平均总时间分别为10.7分钟、14.7分钟和42.2分钟(所有比较P <0.01)。在膀胱镜插入的 ease of(此处可能有误,推测为ease,意为“容易程度”)(9.1对7.7)、膀胱镜操作(8.8对8.1)和冲洗设置(8.8对8.2;所有P≤0.01)方面,对照组得分高于鞘管组。在操作过程中或操作后,两组在手术时间、光学质量或患者舒适度方面均未发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

EndoSheath系统可节省4至31分钟的处理时间,同时避免接触传统浸泡方法中发现的刺激物。尽管带鞘膀胱镜的操作略困难,但光学质量和患者舒适度与标准软性膀胱镜检查相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验