Chirillo Fabio, Salvador Loris, Bacchion Francesco, Grisolia Enrico Franceschini, Valfrè Carlo, Olivari Zoran
Division of Cardiology, Ca'Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 15;100(8):1314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.05.063. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
Subtle or discrete (class 3 in the classification of the European Society of Cardiology) dissection is the most neglected variant of aortic dissection. This study was conducted to define the clinical manifestations, diagnostic findings, and outcomes of subtle or discrete dissection involving the ascending aorta. The clinical and surgical records, preoperative studies, and outcomes of 109 consecutive patients with ascending aortic dissection observed from 1995 to 2005 were reviewed. Eight patients (7.3%) had discrete dissection. Five patients presented with acute anterior chest pain, 2 with abdominal pain, and 4 with syncope. The mean diameter of the ascending aorta was 44 +/- 8.8 mm. The intimal tears were located in all patients on the posterior aspect of the ascending aorta 1 to 40 mm above the left coronary ostium; its length varied from 2.8 to 12.3 mm. Preoperative aortography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography could not identify the discrete intimal tears. Transesophageal echocardiography provided unique diagnostic information on (1) subtle intimal discontinuity, (2) circumscribed intramural hematoma, and (3) discrete pericardial fluid around the dissected aorta. Six patients underwent emergency surgery on the basis of echocardiographic findings, and they were all alive at follow-up. Compared with patients with classic aortic dissection, those with discrete dissection had lower operative mortality (0% vs 26%, p = 0.11), shorter hospital stay (7.2 +/- 2.8 vs 21 +/- 19 days, p = 0.01), and less frequent need for blood transfusions (0% vs 39%, p = 0.02). In conclusion, elevated clinical suspicion and detailed transesophageal echocardiographic examination are important for the early identification of discrete aortic dissection, leading to prompt surgery, shorter hospital stays, and better outcomes.
细微或不连续(欧洲心脏病学会分类中的3类)主动脉夹层是主动脉夹层最易被忽视的类型。本研究旨在明确累及升主动脉的细微或不连续夹层的临床表现、诊断结果及预后。回顾了1995年至2005年间连续观察的109例升主动脉夹层患者的临床和手术记录、术前检查及预后情况。8例患者(7.3%)为不连续夹层。5例患者表现为急性前胸痛,2例为腹痛,4例为晕厥。升主动脉平均直径为44±8.8mm。所有患者的内膜撕裂均位于升主动脉左冠状动脉开口上方1至40mm的后壁;其长度在2.8至12.3mm之间。术前主动脉造影、磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描均未能识别出不连续的内膜撕裂。经食管超声心动图提供了关于(1)细微内膜连续性中断、(2)局限性壁内血肿和(3)夹层主动脉周围离散心包积液的独特诊断信息。6例患者根据超声心动图检查结果接受了急诊手术,随访时均存活。与典型主动脉夹层患者相比,不连续夹层患者的手术死亡率较低(0%对26%,p = 0.11),住院时间较短(7.2±2.8天对21±19天,p = 0.01),输血需求频率较低(0%对39%,p = 0.02)。总之,提高临床怀疑度和进行详细的经食管超声心动图检查对于早期识别不连续主动脉夹层很重要,可促使及时手术、缩短住院时间并改善预后。