Suppr超能文献

一项比较布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚控制正畸疼痛疗效的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of ibuprofen and paracetamol in the control of orthodontic pain.

作者信息

Bradley Rebecca L, Ellis Pamela E, Thomas Peter, Bellis Hugh, Ireland Anthony J, Sandy Jonathan R

机构信息

Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester, and Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):511-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.009.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous research has shown that ibuprofen provides effective relief from orthodontic pain. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether paracetamol (also known as acetaminophen) provided pain relief of equivalent or greater magnitude.

METHODS

A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 3 orthodontic clinics; 159 patients aged 12 to 16 years attending for routine orthodontic treatment were randomly allocated to receive either 400 mg of oral ibuprofen or 1 g of oral paracetamol an hour before and again 6 hours after separator placement. Pain scores were recorded on 7 visual analog scales (10 cm) over a week. The margin of equivalence was defined as 10 mm.

RESULTS

Mean orthodontic pain from 2 hours after separation to bedtime was 8.5 mm (90% CI: lower, 3.7; upper,13.2) higher in the paracetamol group. This confidence interval lies partly outside the margin of equivalence, suggesting that paracetamol is not equivalent, and excludes the value 0, suggesting that ibuprofen is superior. From day 1 onward, there was a trend for patients who had taken ibuprofen to experience less pain at most time intervals compared with the paracetamol group. Two doses of ibuprofen, taken on the day of separator placement, were insufficient to control orthodontic pain on day 1 after placement.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of preoperative and postoperative ibuprofen is more effective than paracetamol in the control of orthodontic pain.

摘要

引言

先前的研究表明布洛芬能有效缓解正畸疼痛。本研究的目的是确定对乙酰氨基酚(也称为扑热息痛)是否能提供同等程度或更大程度的疼痛缓解。

方法

在3家正畸诊所进行了一项多中心、非劣效性随机临床试验;159名年龄在12至16岁、接受常规正畸治疗的患者被随机分配,在放置分离器前1小时和放置后6小时分别服用400毫克口服布洛芬或1克口服对乙酰氨基酚。在一周内通过7个视觉模拟量表(10厘米)记录疼痛评分。等效界值定义为10毫米。

结果

对乙酰氨基酚组从分离后2小时到就寝时间的正畸平均疼痛高出8.5毫米(90%置信区间:下限3.7;上限13.2)。该置信区间部分超出等效界值,表明对乙酰氨基酚不等效,且不包括值0,表明布洛芬更优。从第1天起,与对乙酰氨基酚组相比,服用布洛芬的患者在大多数时间间隔的疼痛趋势更低。在放置分离器当天服用两剂布洛芬不足以控制放置后第1天的正畸疼痛。

结论

术前和术后联合使用布洛芬在控制正畸疼痛方面比扑热息痛更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验