Roque Eliana Mendes de Souza Teixeira, Ferriani Maria das Graças Carvalho
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007 Jul-Aug;15(4):549-55. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692007000400005.
The goal of this study was to track the steps of families that committed some kind of violence against their children and faced judicial intervention, as well as to explore their perceptions about the events involving such intervention; to quantify and assess the lawsuits, during the period from 2000 to 2005, characterizing situations of family violence and re-victimization. The study was theoretically based on the ecological context of human development. The methodology employed was quantitative-qualitative. The tools used were: analysis of the proceedings, filling out census maps, elaboration of genogram and ecomap. The analysis was based on dialectic hermeneutics. The results showed that there were 1766 lawsuits at the court, 8.21% of which were linked to family violence. Three empirical categories came up: I didn't have, which portrays a kind of childhood where negation was a constructive element of interactions, perversely engendered in the economic, political and institutional universes; "It doesn't help and it won't change anything" showed a Judicial System that did not understand society and its conflicts, and "In the street", featuring everyday routines of social exclusion.
本研究的目的是追踪对其子女实施某种暴力行为并面临司法干预的家庭的情况，以及探究他们对涉及此类干预事件的看法；量化并评估2000年至2005年期间的诉讼案件，描述家庭暴力和再次受害的情况。该研究理论上基于人类发展的生态背景。采用的方法是定量与定性相结合。使用的工具包括：诉讼程序分析、填写普查地图、绘制家谱图和生态图。分析基于辩证诠释学。结果显示，法院有1766起诉讼案件，其中8.21%与家庭暴力有关。出现了三个实证类别：“我没有”，描绘了一种童年，其中否定是互动中的一个建设性因素，在经济、政治和制度领域中被反常地引发；“这无济于事，也不会改变任何事情”表明司法系统不理解社会及其冲突，以及“在街上”，其特点是日常的社会排斥惯例。
