手术工效学中的方法学基础架构:任务、模型及测量系统综述
Methodological infrastructure in surgical ergonomics: a review of tasks, models, and measurement systems.
作者信息
Lee Gyusung, Lee Tommy, Dexter David, Klein Rosemary, Park Adrian
机构信息
Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
出版信息
Surg Innov. 2007 Sep;14(3):153-67. doi: 10.1177/1553350607307956.
Though in its infancy, the discipline of surgical ergonomics is increasingly valued. Still, little has been written regarding this field's tasks, models, and measurement systems. These 3 critical experimental components are crucial in objectively and accurately assessing joint and postural control as exhibited by expert laparoscopic surgeons. Such assessments will establish characteristic patterns important for surgical training. In addition, risk factors associated with both minimally invasive surgical instruments and the operating room environment can be identified and minimized. Our review focuses on evidence-based experimental ergonomic studies undertaken in the field of laparoscopic surgery. Publications were located through PubMed and other database and library searches. This article describes tasks, models, and measurement systems and considers their specific applications and the types of data obtainable with the use of each. Advantages and limitations, especially those of measurement systems, are compared and discussed. Future trends and directions believed necessary for optimal investigation and results are also addressed.
尽管外科手术人体工程学尚处于起步阶段,但该学科正日益受到重视。不过,关于这一领域的任务、模型和测量系统的著述仍然很少。这三个关键的实验组成部分对于客观、准确地评估专家腹腔镜外科医生所展现的关节和姿势控制至关重要。此类评估将确立对手术培训很重要的特征模式。此外,与微创手术器械和手术室环境相关的风险因素能够被识别并降至最低。我们的综述聚焦于腹腔镜手术领域基于证据的实验人体工程学研究。通过PubMed以及其他数据库和图书馆检索找到了相关出版物。本文描述了任务、模型和测量系统,并考虑了它们的具体应用以及使用每种系统可获得的数据类型。对优势和局限性,尤其是测量系统的优势和局限性进行了比较和讨论。还探讨了为实现最佳研究和结果而认为必要的未来趋势和方向。