• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者体重指数对腹腔镜手术人体工程学的影响。

Effect of Patient Body Mass Index on Laparoscopic Surgical Ergonomics.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2019 Jun;29(6):1709-1713. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03748-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-019-03748-0
PMID:30712169
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery may introduce new ergonomic challenges for surgeons. Increased patient body mass index (BMI) may further add to this ergonomic stress.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to quantify the ergonomic impact of patient BMI on surgeons during laparoscopic surgery.

SETTING

University Hospital, USA.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study analyzed five minimally invasive surgeons during 24 laparoscopic procedures. Each subject's muscle stress was assessed by recording surface electromyography (EMG) data from eight upper body muscle groups during laparoscopic procedures. EMG data was normalized against the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of each muscle measured before the start of surgery to create a percentage of the MVC value (%MVC). Subject workload was assessed through the NASA Task Load Index (NTLX). Statistical analysis was used to determine significance between surgeons operating on patients with or without obesity for %MVC and NTLX scores.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in both the average muscle activation of all eight muscle groups and NTLX scores during laparoscopic surgery in surgeons operating on patients with BMI > = 30 compared with patients with a BMI < 30.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected no differences in ergonomic stress or workload for surgeons operating on patients with or without obesity. For surgeons, the laparoscopic approach may offer an additional advantage over open surgery in patients with obesity. This advantage may be due to an "equalizing effect" of laparoscopy-that surgical ergonomics are less affected by the BMI of the patient when using laparoscopic tools.

摘要

背景

微创手术可能会给外科医生带来新的人体工程学挑战。患者体重指数(BMI)的增加可能会进一步增加这种人体工程学压力。

目的

本研究的目的是量化患者 BMI 对腹腔镜手术中外科医生的人体工程学影响。

设置

美国大学医院。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究分析了 24 例腹腔镜手术中的 5 名微创外科医生。每位受试者的肌肉应激通过记录腹腔镜手术过程中 8 个上半身肌肉群的表面肌电图(EMG)数据来评估。EMG 数据通过将手术开始前测量的每个肌肉的最大自主收缩(MVC)与 EMG 数据进行归一化,以创建 MVC 值的百分比(%MVC)。通过 NASA 任务负荷指数(NTLX)评估受试者的工作负荷。使用统计分析来确定在 BMI≥30 的患者和 BMI<30 的患者之间进行手术的外科医生的%MVC 和 NTLX 评分之间的差异是否具有统计学意义。

结果

在 BMI≥30 的患者和 BMI<30 的患者之间进行手术的外科医生的平均 8 个肌肉群的肌肉激活和 NTLX 评分之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

我们没有发现对 BMI≥30 和 BMI<30 的患者进行手术的外科医生的人体工程学压力或工作负荷有差异。对于外科医生来说,与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术可能在肥胖患者中提供了额外的优势。这种优势可能归因于腹腔镜的“均衡效应”,即使用腹腔镜工具时,手术的人体工程学受患者 BMI 的影响较小。

相似文献

1
Effect of Patient Body Mass Index on Laparoscopic Surgical Ergonomics.患者体重指数对腹腔镜手术人体工程学的影响。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jun;29(6):1709-1713. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03748-0.
2
Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels.不同经验水平下腹腔镜和机器人手术任务表现的人机工程学分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1938-1943. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6478-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Ergonomic analysis of primary and assistant surgical roles.主刀和助手手术角色的人体工程学分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.058. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.功能性腹腔镜技能(FLS)任务可作为区分腹腔镜手术和机器人手术人体工程学差异的指标。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2459-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3497-7. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
5
Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术相关的身体和认知工效学的比较评估
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):456-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3213-z. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
6
Which causes more ergonomic stress: Laparoscopic or open surgery?哪种手术方式造成的人体工程学压力更大:腹腔镜手术还是开放手术?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3286-3290. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5360-5. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
7
Impact of Obesity on Surgeon Ergonomics in Robotic and Straight-Stick Laparoscopic Surgery.肥胖对机器人和直杆腹腔镜手术中外科医生人体工程学的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jul-Aug;27(5):1063-1069. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
8
Assessment of muscle activity and fatigue during laparoscopic surgery.评估腹腔镜手术中的肌肉活动和疲劳。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6672-6678. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08937-6. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
9
Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术的人体工程学分析
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3379-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3604-9. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
10
Gender equity in ergonomics: does muscle effort in laparoscopic surgery differ between men and women?人因工程学中的性别公平:腹腔镜手术中的肌肉用力在男性和女性之间是否存在差异?
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):396-401. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08295-3. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in objective assessment of ergonomics in endoscopic surgery: a review.内镜手术工效学客观评估的研究进展:综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1281194. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281194. eCollection 2023.
2
Unpacking the Broad Landscape of Intraoperative Stressors for Clinical Personnel: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.剖析临床人员术中应激源的广阔图景:一项混合方法的系统综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jul 17;16:1953-1977. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S401325. eCollection 2023.
3
Patient Factors Affect Ergonomic Strain of Endoscopists During Colonoscopy.

本文引用的文献

1
Which causes more ergonomic stress: Laparoscopic or open surgery?哪种手术方式造成的人体工程学压力更大:腹腔镜手术还是开放手术?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3286-3290. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5360-5. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
2
Transfer and priming of surgical skills across minimally invasive surgical platforms.手术技能在微创外科平台间的转移与预适应
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Ergonomic analysis of primary and assistant surgical roles.主刀和助手手术角色的人体工程学分析
结肠镜检查期间影响内镜医师人体工程学劳损的患者因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):736-743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07721-3. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
4
Objective assessment of surgeon kinematics during simulated laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary evaluation of the effect of high body mass index models.模拟腹腔镜手术中外科医生运动学的客观评估:高身体质量指数模型影响的初步评估。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Jan;17(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02455-5. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
5
Obesity and Kidney Stone Procedures.肥胖与肾结石手术
Rev Urol. 2020;22(1):24-29.
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.058. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
The minimally invasive approach is associated with reduced surgical site infections in obese patients undergoing proctectomy.对于接受直肠切除术的肥胖患者,微创方法与手术部位感染减少相关。
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Dec;19(12):733-43. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1356-8. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Laparoscopic revolution in bariatric surgery.减重手术中的腹腔镜革命。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 7;20(41):15135-43. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15135.
6
Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术的人体工程学分析
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3379-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3604-9. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
7
FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.功能性腹腔镜技能(FLS)任务可作为区分腹腔镜手术和机器人手术人体工程学差异的指标。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2459-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3497-7. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
8
Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术相关的身体和认知工效学的比较评估
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):456-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3213-z. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese: physiologic considerations and surgical techniques to optimize success.肥胖症患者的腹腔镜检查:优化手术成功率的生理考量与手术技巧
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):182-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
10
Laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair in the era of obesity.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术在肥胖时代。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Aug;148(8):723-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1395.