Pizzolitto S, Piemonte M
Istituto di Anatomia e Istologia Patologica, Ospedale Civile Regionale di Udine.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1991 Jul-Aug;11(4):395-404.
Hyperparathyroidism (HPT), once considered a rare disease, is nowadays observed and diagnosed more frequently. Consequently, surgical treatment of HPT is often performed with good therapeutic results. The success of parathyroid surgery depends mainly on the accuracy of histopathologic diagnosis through intraoperative examination of frozen tissue specimens. Yet, parathyroid gland pathology is very complex and some of its topics even controversial. Terminology and clinico-pathological concepts in this field are constantly changing and even basic characteristics such as weight, stromal fat content and "normal " histologic patterns of these glands are still actively discussed. The pathologist must often determine, merely by studying a small bioptic specimen, not only the parathyroidal (or non-parathyroidal) origin of the examined tissue, but also the histological "normal" or "abnormality" of the tissue. In carrying out his work the experienced pathologist takes on an important task and responsibility in distinguishing between normal, early hyperplastic (asymmetric), hyperplastic or adenomatous parathyroid glands. New diagnostic technical approaches (such as Electron Microscopy, intracellular fat morphometric evaluation, parenchymal cell mass study by density gradient, etc.) enhance the possibility of reaching a reliable pathologic diagnosis, but they do not solve all the present problems and sometimes can even lead the pathologist astray. Presently the diagnosis and treatment of primary HPT should be considered an open and current problem inasmuch as definite criteria to be followed in distinguishing between normal or single enlarged glands microscopically are still lacking. Neither the degree of accuracy of intraoperative frozen section examination during parathyroid surgery nor the possibility of misleading observations in such a study has been fully evaluated. A close cooperation between the pathologist and head and neck surgeon is of utmost importance to assure the best therapeutical results obtainable from parathyroid surgery in HPT.
甲状旁腺功能亢进症(HPT),曾被认为是一种罕见疾病,如今其观察和诊断更为频繁。因此,HPT的外科治疗常常取得良好的治疗效果。甲状旁腺手术的成功主要取决于通过术中对冰冻组织标本进行检查的组织病理学诊断的准确性。然而,甲状旁腺病理学非常复杂,其中一些主题甚至存在争议。该领域的术语和临床病理概念不断变化,甚至这些腺体的重量、间质脂肪含量和“正常”组织学模式等基本特征仍在积极讨论中。病理学家常常必须仅通过研究一小份活检标本,不仅要确定被检查组织的甲状旁腺(或非甲状旁腺)起源,还要确定该组织的组织学“正常”或“异常”情况。经验丰富的病理学家在开展工作时,肩负着区分正常、早期增生(不对称)、增生或腺瘤样甲状旁腺的重要任务和责任。新的诊断技术方法(如电子显微镜、细胞内脂肪形态计量评估、通过密度梯度研究实质细胞团等)提高了做出可靠病理诊断的可能性,但它们并未解决所有当前问题,有时甚至会使病理学家误入歧途。目前,原发性HPT的诊断和治疗应被视为一个尚未解决的当前问题,因为在显微镜下区分正常或单个增大腺体仍缺乏明确的标准。甲状旁腺手术中术中冰冻切片检查的准确性程度以及该研究中出现误导性观察结果的可能性均未得到充分评估。病理学家与头颈外科医生之间的密切合作对于确保HPT甲状旁腺手术能获得最佳治疗效果至关重要。