Mutha Pratik K, Sainburg Robert L
Department of Kinesiology, 29, Recreation Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Dec;26(6):808-23. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
Previous research on single joint movements has lead to the development of models of control that propose that movement speed and distance are controlled through an initial pulsatile signal that can be modified in both amplitude and duration. However, the manner in which the amplitude and duration are modulated during the control of movement remains controversial. We now report two studies that were designed to differentiate the mechanisms used to control movement speed from those employed to control final position accuracy. In our first study, participants move at a series of speeds to a single spatial target. In this task, acceleration duration (pulse-width) varied substantially across speeds, and was negatively correlated with peak acceleration (pulse-height). In a second experiment, we removed the spatial target, but required movements at the three speeds similar to those used in the first study. In this task, acceleration amplitude varied extensively across the speed targets, while acceleration duration remained constant. Taken together, our current findings demonstrate that pulse-width measures can be modulated independently from pulse-height measures, and that a positive correlation between such measures is not obligatory, even when sampled across a range of movement speeds. In addition, our findings suggest that pulse-height modulation plays a primary role in controlling movement speed and specifying target distance, whereas pulse-width mechanisms are employed to correct errors in pulse-height control, as required to achieve spatial precision in final limb position.
先前对单关节运动的研究已促成了控制模型的发展,这些模型提出运动速度和距离是通过一个初始的脉动信号来控制的,该信号在幅度和持续时间上均可被调节。然而,在运动控制过程中幅度和持续时间是如何被调制的,这一点仍存在争议。我们现在报告两项研究,其旨在区分用于控制运动速度的机制与用于控制最终位置精度的机制。在我们的第一项研究中,参与者以一系列速度朝着单个空间目标移动。在这项任务中,加速持续时间(脉冲宽度)在不同速度下有很大变化,并且与峰值加速度(脉冲高度)呈负相关。在第二项实验中,我们移除了空间目标,但要求以与第一项研究中使用的三种速度类似的速度进行运动。在这项任务中,加速度幅度在不同速度目标间有广泛变化,而加速持续时间保持恒定。综合来看,我们目前的研究结果表明,脉冲宽度测量可以独立于脉冲高度测量进行调制,并且即使在一系列运动速度范围内进行采样,这些测量之间的正相关也并非必然。此外,我们的研究结果表明,脉冲高度调制在控制运动速度和确定目标距离方面起主要作用,而脉冲宽度机制则用于纠正脉冲高度控制中的误差,以实现肢体最终位置的空间精度。